MediaTek Dimensity 6300
vs
Samsung Exynos 990
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
and
Samsung Exynos 990
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 6 nm (6 nm vs 7 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: April 2024 (April 2024 vs October 2019)
- Higher Frequency: 2730 MHz (2400 MHz vs 2730 MHz)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
April 2024
Launch Date
October 2019
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Dimensity 6300
Model Name
S5E9830
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
7 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
2730 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G57 MP2
GPU name
Mali-G77 MP11
-
GPU frequency
800 MHz
-
FLOPS
1.126 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
64
2
Execution units
11
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
3840 x 2400
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 3300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
-
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.1
5
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
2750 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
1 MB
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 25MP
UFS 2.2
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
2K at 30FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
2K at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS
-
TDP
9 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 6300
790
Exynos 990
842
+7%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 6300
2030
Exynos 990
2672
+32%
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 6300
476569
Exynos 990
721171
+51%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
UleFone Armor X32 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
3873
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
7642
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
UleFone Armor X31 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
2834
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
Samsung Exynos 990
5706
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Motorola Moto G Power (2025)
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
2626
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
Samsung Exynos 990
5261
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (Dimensity 6300)
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
2703
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
7365
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
UleFone Armor Mini 20T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
153
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
494
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Realme 14x
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
36102
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
19460
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G Power (2025)
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
11299
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
12071
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-6300-vs-samsung-exynos-990" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Samsung Exynos 990</a>