MediaTek Dimensity 1200
vs
Samsung Exynos 1380
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
and
Samsung Exynos 1380
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3000 MHz (3000 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
- Higher Technology: 5 nm (6 nm vs 5 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: February 2023 (January 2021 vs February 2023)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
January 2021
Launch Date
February 2023
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
MT6893
Model Name
S5E8835
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
5 nm
3000 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G77 MP9
GPU name
Mali-G68 MP5
850 MHz
GPU frequency
950 MHz
0.9792 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.608 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
-
9
Execution units
5
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 4700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 3790 Mbps
LTE Cat. 19
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
320 KB
L2 Cache
-
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
10 W
TDP
5 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
MediaTek APU 3.0
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 1200
1118
+11%
Exynos 1380
1008
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 1200
3198
+15%
Exynos 1380
2773
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 1200
999
+61%
Exynos 1380
620
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 1200
708061
+22%
Exynos 1380
578941
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Realme GT Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
7775
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
5860
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Mi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
7396
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1380
5001
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Xiaomi Mi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
9135
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1380
6329
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
447
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
295
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming Edition
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
336
Samsung Galaxy A35
Samsung Exynos 1380
280
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
4558
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
2966
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Mi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
1311
Samsung Galaxy A54
Samsung Exynos 1380
808
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Dimensity 1200)
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
4542
Samsung Galaxy A54
Samsung Exynos 1380
2844
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Realme GT Neo 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
36303
Samsung Galaxy M54
Samsung Exynos 1380
17460
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Realme X7 Max 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
15887
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1380)
Samsung Exynos 1380
13227
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT Neo 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
1287
Samsung Galaxy A54
Samsung Exynos 1380
797
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-1200-vs-samsung-exynos-1380" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Samsung Exynos 1380</a>