HiSilicon Kirin 9000
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
and
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3300 MHz (3130 MHz vs 3300 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: October 2023 (October 2020 vs October 2023)
Basic
HiSilicon
Label Name
Qualcomm
October 2020
Launch Date
October 2023
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
Kirin 9000
Model Name
SM8650-AB
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
5x (3x3.2 GHz/2x3.0GHz) – Cortex-A720
2x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A520
5x (3x3.2 GHz/2x3.0GHz) – Cortex-A720
2x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
3130 MHz
Frequency
3300 MHz
15.3
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Mali-G78 MP24
GPU name
Adreno 750
759 MHz
GPU frequency
770 MHz
2.3316 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
64
Shading units
-
24
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
3.0 FP
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
4K @ 60 Hz, QHD+ @ 144 Hz
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 4600 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
2750 MHz
Memory frequency
4800 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
6 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9
AI accelerator
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Kirin 9000
1266
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
2192
+73%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Kirin 9000
3529
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
7085
+101%
AnTuTu 10
Kirin 9000
925940
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
1933536
+109%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6410
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
19778
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Huawei Mate X2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
621
Redmagic 9S Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
1840
3DMark Wild Life
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6072
Asus ROG Phone 8 / 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
18450
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
2060
Asus ROG Phone 8 / 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
5205
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6774
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
21026
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
39858
Asus ZenFone 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
62240
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
9262
Lenovo Legion Y700 (2025)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
25201
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
2057
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
5029
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/hisilicon-kirin-9000-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-8-gen-3" target="_blank">HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3</a>