HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of HiSilicon Kirin 659 and Samsung Exynos 2400 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (16 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (2360 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (January 2017 vs January 2024)
Basic
HiSilicon
Label Name
Samsung
January 2017
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
-
Manufacturing
Samsung
Hi6250
Model Name
Exynos 2400
4x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X42x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A7203x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A7204x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
16 nm
Technology
4 nm
2360 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz
4
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Mali-T830 MP2
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
900 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
0.0576 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
16
Shading units
-
2
Execution units
-
1.2
OpenCL version
-
1.0
Vulkan version
-
1920 x 1200
Max display resolution
-
11
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 7
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
No
5G support
Yes
4.2
Bluetooth
5.4
4
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR3
Memory type
LPDDR5X
933 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
2x 32 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
No
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
1K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Kirin 659
215
Exynos 2400
2080
+867%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Kirin 659
810
Exynos 2400
6582
+713%
AnTuTu 10
Kirin 659
101873
Exynos 2400
1698761
+1568%
