Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2400
and
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 7 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (3210 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: October 2024 (January 2024 vs October 2024)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
HiSilicon
January 2024
Launch Date
October 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
SMIC
Exynos 2400
Model Name
Kirin 8000
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 2.4 GHz – 1xA77 H
3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz – A55
3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz – A55
10
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
7 nm
3210 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU name
Mali-G610 MP4
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
864 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.4423 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
128
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.3
Connectivity
Up to 10000 Mbps
Download speed
-
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
-
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
8K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2400
2080
+104%
Kirin 8000
1019
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2400
6582
+119%
Kirin 8000
3007
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2400
1698761
+155%
Kirin 8000
666377
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
316
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
Huawei Nova 13 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
46991
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
10251
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2400-vs-hisilicon-kirin-8000" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2400 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000</a>