Google Tensor vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of Google Tensor and HiSilicon Kirin 9000S mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 5 nm (5 nm vs 14 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2800 MHz (2800 MHz vs 2620 MHz)
- Higher Max Bandwidth: 51.2 Gbit/s (51.2 Gbit/s vs 44 Gbit/s)
- Newer Launch Date: August 2023 (October 2021 vs August 2023)
Basic
Google
Label Name
HiSilicon
October 2021
Launch Date
August 2023
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
SMIC
S5E9845
Model Name
Kirin 9000S
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
Architecture
2x 2.62 GHz – Cortex-X1
4x 2.15 GHz – Cortex-A710
6x 1.53 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
12
5 nm
Technology
14 nm
2800 MHz
Frequency
2620 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G78 MP20
GPU name
Maleoon 910
848 MHz
GPU frequency
750 MHz
2.1709 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
64
Shading units
-
20
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2750 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
51.2 Gbit/s
Max Bandwidth
44 Gbit/s
Miscellaneous
Tensor Processing Unit
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
-
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
5.6 W
TDP
7 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
-
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Tensor
1319
+8%
Kirin 9000S
1222
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Tensor
3234
Kirin 9000S
3622
+12%
AnTuTu 10
Tensor
813782
Kirin 9000S
923510
+13%
