Google Tensor G4
vs
Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Google Tensor G4
and
Samsung Exynos 2200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3100 MHz (3100 MHz vs 2800 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: August 2024 (August 2024 vs January 2022)
Basic
Google
Label Name
Samsung
August 2024
Launch Date
January 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
Tensor G4
Model Name
S5E9925
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A520
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3100 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G715 MP7
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
940 MHz
GPU frequency
810 MHz
2.5267 TFLOPS
FLOPS
3.1104 TFLOPS
192
Shading units
640
-
Execution units
3
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.1
3840 x 2400
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
-
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.2
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
-
TDP
7 W
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Tensor G4
2045
+28%
Exynos 2200
1594
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Tensor G4
4932
+34%
Exynos 2200
3685
FP32 (float)
Tensor G4
2475
Exynos 2200
3172
+28%
AnTuTu 10
Tensor G4
1199938
+33%
Exynos 2200
902026
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4
11408
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4
11952
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Google Pixel 10a
Google Tensor G4
1097
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4
1063
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1042
3DMark Wild Life
Google Pixel 10a
Google Tensor G4
9448
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
8152
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 10a
Google Tensor G4
2670
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1967
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Google Pixel 10a
Google Tensor G4
9642
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
7940
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Tensor G4
34804
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4
13261
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 10a
Google Tensor G4
2660
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1958
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/google-tensor-g4-vs-samsung-exynos-2200" target="_blank">Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 2200</a>