MediaTek Dimensity 900

MediaTek Dimensity 900

MediaTek Dimensity 900: A Balance of Power and Efficiency in Mid-Range Smartphones

April 2025


Introduction

The MediaTek Dimensity 900, introduced in 2023, continues to be a popular choice for mid-range smartphones even in 2025. This processor combines modern technology, 5G support, and energy efficiency, making it ideal for users seeking an optimal price-to-performance ratio. In this article, we will explore how the Dimensity 900 handles contemporary challenges, what sets it apart from competitors, and who it is suitable for.


1. Architecture and Process Technology: The Foundation of Stability

6 nm Process Technology:

The processor is manufactured using 6 nm technology (TSMC), ensuring low energy consumption (TDP 4W) and moderate heating. This allows devices to operate longer without overheating, even under heavy load.

CPU Configuration:

- 8 Cores: 2 high-performance Cortex-A78 cores (up to 2.4 GHz) + 6 energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores (up to 2.0 GHz).

- Hybrid Architecture: Optimized for multitasking; powerful cores handle gaming and demanding applications, while energy-efficient cores manage background processes.

Graphics Mali-G68 MP4:

The GPU with 4 compute units supports:

- Resolutions up to Full HD+ (1080p) at 120 Hz.

- HyperEngine 3.0 technologies for smooth gaming.

- Accelerated 4K HDR video decoding.

Frequencies and Performance:

- Single-Core (Geekbench 6): 898 points.

- Multi-Core (Geekbench 6): 2240 points.

- AnTuTu 10: 505,728 points.

Conclusion: The architecture is designed for a balance between power and autonomy, which is relevant for smartphones priced at $250–$400.


2. Performance in Real-World Tasks

Gaming:

- Casual and Mid-Core: Handles games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty: Mobile well at medium settings (60 FPS). In Genshin Impact, frame rates may drop to 40 FPS at high graphical settings.

- Heat Optimization: Thanks to the TDP of 4 W and 6 nm technology, smartphones rarely overheat even after 30–40 minutes of gaming.

Multimedia:

- Support for HDR10+ and AV1/VP9 codecs for 4K streaming.

- Hardware acceleration for video editing in apps like Adobe Premiere Rush.

AI Applications:

- The APU 3.0 AI engine enhances camera performance (night mode, scene recognition), voice assistants, and AR applications.

Energy Consumption:

- Smartphones with a 5000 mAh battery last 1.5–2 days with moderate use.

- Smart Power Saving technology reduces power consumption in the background.


3. Built-in Modules: The Connectivity of the Future

5G Modem:

- Support for SA/NSA networks, speeds up to 2.77 Gbps.

- Dual SIM 5G: Simultaneous operation of two SIM cards.

Wi-Fi and Bluetooth:

- Wi-Fi 6: Speeds up to 1.2 Gbps, stable connections in congested networks.

- Bluetooth 5.2: Low-latency connection for headphones (LC3 codec).

Navigation:

- GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou. Positioning accuracy - up to 1 meter.

Conclusion: The Dimensity 900 is ready for the demands of 2025, including operation in Standalone 5G networks and support for IoT devices.


4. Comparison with Competitors

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 2:

- Advantage of Snapdragon: Adreno GPU is better for gaming (by 15–20%).

- Disadvantage: Devices with Snapdragon 7 Gen 2 are more expensive ($350–$500).

Exynos 1380:

- Similar CPU performance, but the Mali-G68 in the Dimensity 900 is more efficient for video rendering.

- The Exynos 1380 tends to overheat more frequently under prolonged loads.

Previous Generations (Dimensity 920):

- The Dimensity 900 is 10% faster in multi-threaded tasks due to core optimization of the A78.

Conclusion: The Dimensity 900 offers advantages in price and energy efficiency, but falls short in GPU performance compared to top-tier chips.


5. Use Cases

Gaming:

- Ideal for mobile gaming without ultra-settings. Stability of FPS and low heating are vital for streamers.

Daily Tasks:

- Smooth performance in social media, messaging apps, and web browsing.

Photography and Video:

- Supports cameras up to 108 MP.

- Modes for HDR, night shooting, and stabilization for 4K video at 30 fps.

Conclusion: The processor is suitable for users who don’t need maximum settings but value reliability.


6. Pros and Cons

Pros:

- Energy efficiency of 6 nm.

- Support for 5G and Wi-Fi 6.

- Affordable device prices.

Cons:

- Mali-G68 MP4 is weaker than competitors in heavy gaming.

- No support for 2K displays.


7. Practical Tips for Choosing a Smartphone

- Cooling: Look for models with vapor chamber cooling or graphite coating.

- Display: Full HD+ with a refresh rate of 90–120 Hz for smooth animation.

- Battery: At least 5000 mAh for comfortable 5G usage.

Examples of 2025 Models:

- Realme 11 Pro ($300): AMOLED 120 Hz, 108 MP camera.

- Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro ($280): 67 W charging, stereo speakers.


8. Final Verdict

The MediaTek Dimensity 900 is an excellent choice for:

- Budget gamers willing to compromise on graphics.

- Users who value autonomy and stability.

- Content creators shooting video in 4K.

The main benefits include low device costs, support for modern communication standards, and decent performance in 2025. If you are looking for a smartphone under $400 without overpaying for "extra" power, the Dimensity 900 is an excellent option.

Basic

Label Name
MediaTek
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Launch Date
May 2021
Manufacturing
TSMC
Model Name
MT6877
Architecture
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores
8
Technology
6 nm
Frequency
2400 MHz
Transistor count
10

GPU Specifications

GPU name
Mali-G68 MP4
GPU frequency
900 MHz
FLOPS
0.621 TFLOPS
Shading units
48
Execution units
4
OpenCL version
2.0
Vulkan version
1.3
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
DirectX version
12

Connectivity

4G support
LTE Cat. 18
5G support
Yes
Bluetooth
5.2
Wi-Fi
6
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

Memory type
LPDDR5
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
TDP
4 W
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
898
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
2240
FP32 (float)
Score
609
AnTuTu 10
Score
505728
AiTuTu 3
Score
72972

Phones with Dimensity 900

Honor X20
Honor X20
Infinix Zero 5G
Infinix Zero 5G
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Oppo Reno6 5G
Oppo Reno6 5G
Oppo Reno7 5G Global
Oppo Reno7 5G Global
Samsung Galaxy M53
Samsung Galaxy M53
UleFone Power Armor 18
UleFone Power Armor 18
UleFone Power Armor 18T
UleFone Power Armor 18T
UMIDIGI A13 Pro Max 5G
UMIDIGI A13 Pro Max 5G
UMIDIGI Bison GT2 5G
UMIDIGI Bison GT2 5G
Vivo V25
Vivo V25
Vivo Y100
Vivo Y100

Comparison of Devices with Dimensity 900

3DMark Sling Shot
UleFone Power Armor 18
5148
Honor X20
5126
UleFone Power Armor 18T
5106
Vivo Y100
5103
Samsung Galaxy M53
5087
UMIDIGI Bison GT2 5G
5075
Infinix Zero 5G
5044
UMIDIGI A13 Pro Max 5G
4991
Vivo V25
4982
Oppo Reno6 5G
4857
Oppo Reno7 5G Global
4842
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
4794
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Vivo Y100
3988
UMIDIGI A13 Pro Max 5G
3984
Samsung Galaxy M53
3970
UleFone Power Armor 18T
3967
UMIDIGI Bison GT2 5G
3959
Vivo V25
3890
Honor X20
3862
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
3854
Oppo Reno6 5G
3854
Oppo Reno7 5G Global
3849
UleFone Power Armor 18
3768
Infinix Zero 5G
3715
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Samsung Galaxy M53
3849
UleFone Power Armor 18T
3791
Oppo Reno6 5G
3747
Oppo Reno7 5G Global
3686
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
3671
Honor X20
3666
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
4109
Samsung Galaxy M53
4007
Oppo Reno6 5G
3795
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
5315
Oppo Reno7 5G Global
5257
Samsung Galaxy M53
5144
Oppo Reno6 5G
5086
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo V25
230
Vivo Y100
228
Samsung Galaxy M53
227
UMIDIGI A13 Pro Max 5G
227
Honor X20
226
UleFone Power Armor 18
223
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
223
Oppo Reno6 5G
223
Oppo Reno7 5G Global
222
UleFone Power Armor 18T
220
UMIDIGI Bison GT2 5G
220
Infinix Zero 5G
200
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy M53
2197
Honor X20
2181
UMIDIGI Bison GT2 5G
2177
Oppo Reno6 5G
2172
Vivo Y100
2171
UleFone Power Armor 18T
2171
Vivo V25
2169
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
2169
UMIDIGI A13 Pro Max 5G
2168
Oppo Reno7 5G Global
2044
Infinix Zero 5G
2039
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo V25
612
Vivo Y100
610
Samsung Galaxy M53
609
UleFone Power Armor 18T
604
UMIDIGI A13 Pro Max 5G
603
UMIDIGI Bison GT2 5G
600
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
599
Oppo Reno6 5G
598
Oppo Reno7 5G Global
595
Honor X20
593
Infinix Zero 5G
566
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy M53
2162
UMIDIGI Bison GT2 5G
2151
Oppo Reno6 5G
2111
Vivo V25
2107
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
2001
Oppo Reno7 5G Global
1988
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Infinix Zero 5G
34849
UleFone Power Armor 18
27416
UleFone Power Armor 18T
27022
UMIDIGI A13 Pro Max 5G
26570
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
23582
Oppo Reno6 5G
23475
Vivo V25
22927
Oppo Reno7 5G Global
22692
Samsung Galaxy M53
20651
UMIDIGI Bison GT2 5G
19618
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Infinix Zero 5G
12857
UleFone Power Armor 18
11287
Samsung Galaxy M53
10961
UMIDIGI A13 Pro Max 5G
10791
UleFone Power Armor 18T
10540
UMIDIGI Bison GT2 5G
9663
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
9557
Oppo Reno6 5G
9464
Oppo Reno7 5G Global
9398
Vivo Y100
9395
Vivo V25
8860
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy M53
592
Oppo Reno7 5G Global
592
Vivo V25
587

Compared to Other SoC

Geekbench 6 Single Core
2222 +147.4%
1163 +29.5%
563 -37.3%
295 -67.1%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
5741 +156.3%
3234 +44.4%
1442 -35.6%
848 -62.1%
FP32 (float)
1015 +66.7%
414 -32%
257 -57.8%
AnTuTu 10
925940 +83.1%
707196 +39.8%
505728
419438 -17.1%
295033 -41.7%
AiTuTu 3
76955 +5.5%
73521 +0.8%
72052 -1.3%
71822 -1.6%