Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 6 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 3200 MHz (3200 MHz vs 2500 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: November 2022 (November 2022 vs October 2021)

Basic

Qualcomm
Label Name
Qualcomm
November 2022
Launch Date
October 2021
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM8550-AB
Model Name
SM7325-AE
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X3
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
6 nm
3200 MHz
Frequency
2500 MHz

GPU Specifications

Adreno 740
GPU name
Adreno 642
680 MHz
GPU frequency
550 MHz
3.4816 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.8448 TFLOPS
1280
Shading units
384
2
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12.1
DirectX version
12.1

Connectivity

Up to 10000 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 3700 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.2
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

1 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 192MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
6.3 W
TDP
5 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
Hexagon
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 770

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1993 +86%
Snapdragon 778G Plus
1069
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
5328 +77%
Snapdragon 778G Plus
3008
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3411 +296%
Snapdragon 778G Plus
861
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1550709 +157%
Snapdragon 778G Plus
604344

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
16040
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5656
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
18518
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
7383
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1152
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
250
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Meizu 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1185
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
244
3DMark Wild Life
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
13757
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2799
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3860
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
768
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8S Pro / 8S Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
14583
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2642
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
54872
Xiaomi Civi 1S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
22519
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Meizu 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
19449
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
12441