Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
vs
Samsung Exynos 2500
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
and
Samsung Exynos 2500
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 3 nm (4 nm vs 3 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2025 (November 2022 vs January 2025)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
Samsung
November 2022
Launch Date
January 2025
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
SM8550-AB
Model Name
Exynos 2500
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X3
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
4 nm
Technology
3 nm
3200 MHz
Frequency
3200 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 740
GPU name
-
680 MHz
GPU frequency
-
3.4816 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
1280
Shading units
-
2
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.1
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12.1
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 10000 Mbps
Download speed
-
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.4
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5T
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
4800 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
-
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.0
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
6.3 W
TDP
-
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Hexagon
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1993
Exynos 2500
2719
+36%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
5328
Exynos 2500
9016
+69%
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1550709
Exynos 2500
2570180
+66%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
16040
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
19059
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
18518
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
25095
3DMark Solar Bay
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
5622
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
9365
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
549
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
1160
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
527
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
1200
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8S Pro / 8S Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
6471
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
10736
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1152
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2233
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Meizu 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1185
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2342
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
54872
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
37192
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Meizu 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
19449
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
16072
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-8-gen-2-vs-samsung-exynos-2500" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 2500</a>