AMD Radeon R9 370 1024SP

AMD Radeon R9 370 1024SP: A Review of an Outdated Fighter in 2025
April 2025
Despite the rapid technological advancements, some GPUs continue to attract budget-conscious users. The AMD Radeon R9 370 1024SP is a card released nearly a decade ago, but it still appears on the secondary market. Let's explore whether it's worth considering in 2025 and who it might be suitable for.
1. Architecture and Key Features
GCN 1.0: Legacy of the Past
The Radeon R9 370 1024SP is built on the Graphics Core Next (GCN) 1.0 architecture, which debuted in 2012. The manufacturing process is 28 nm, which appears archaic by today’s standards (new GPUs use 5–7 nm).
Key Features:
- 1024 shader processors — the basis for computations.
- Support for DirectX 12 (Feature Level 12_0) and OpenGL 4.6.
- Lack of hardware ray tracing and AI accelerators.
Unique Functions:
- AMD FidelityFX — a set of optimizations for improving image quality (contrast sharpness, upscaling), but implemented partially through drivers.
- FreeSync — synchronization with monitors to eliminate tearing.
The card does not support DLSS, FSR 3.0, or similar technologies, which limits its capabilities in modern games.
2. Memory: Speed and Capacity
GDDR5: Humble Capabilities
- Memory Type: GDDR5 (not GDDR6 or HBM).
- Capacity: 2 GB or 4 GB depending on the variant.
- Bus: 256-bit.
- Bandwidth: 179.2 GB/s (for the 4 GB version).
Impact on Performance:
- 2 GB — critically low for 2025 games even at low settings (textures "consume" memory).
- 4 GB — the minimal acceptable option for 1080p in older projects.
3. Game Performance
1080p: Limits of Capability
Testing games from 2024–2025 shows that the R9 370 1024SP struggles with modern AAA titles. Examples (at medium settings):
- Cyberpunk 2077 (2023): 15–20 FPS (1080p, no Ray Tracing).
- Fortnite (Chapter 6): 30–35 FPS (1080p, FSR Quality).
- Apex Legends: 40–45 FPS (1080p).
- The Witcher 3 (2022 Remaster): 25–30 FPS (1080p).
Resolutions:
- 1440p and 4K — not recommended due to lack of memory and processing power.
Ray Tracing: Not supported natively. Software emulation drops FPS to 5–10 frames.
4. Professional Tasks
Basic Capabilities
- Video Editing: Suitable for work in DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro at up to 1080p resolutions, but rendering will be slow.
- 3D Modeling: Handles simple scenes in Blender or Maya, but lacks memory and speed for complex projects (OpenCL).
- Scientific Calculations: Limited OpenCL support, no specialized cores (like CUDA from NVIDIA).
Conclusion: The card is only fit for educational or hobbyist projects.
5. Power Consumption and Heat Dissipation
TDP 150W: Don’t Forget the Power Supply
- TDP: 150 W.
- PSU Recommendations: At least 500 W (with headroom for the CPU and peripherals).
- Cooling: The reference cooler is effective but noisy. Optimal choices are models with dual fans (e.g., Sapphire or MSI).
- Case: Good ventilation is essential (2–3 fans for intake/exhaust).
6. Comparison with Competitors
Outdated Analogues
- NVIDIA GTX 960 (4 GB): Comparable in performance but better optimized for DX12.
- AMD RX 560 (4 GB): Lower power consumption (+30% performance).
- Intel Arc A380: Newer, supports Ray Tracing and XeSS, but more expensive ($150–170).
Prices (new, if you can find them):
- R9 370 1024SP — $80–120 (rare leftovers).
- Intel Arc A380 — $150.
7. Practical Tips
How to Avoid Troubles
- Power Supply: 500 W, 80+ Bronze. Example: Corsair CX550.
- Compatibility: Requires PCIe 3.0 x16. Compatible with Windows 10/11, but drivers are rarely updated.
- Drivers: Use Adrenalin 22.6.1 (the last stable version for GCN 1.0).
8. Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Low price on the secondary market ($50–80).
- Supports FreeSync.
- Sufficient for office tasks and older games.
Cons:
- No Ray Tracing or AI accelerators.
- High power consumption.
- Limited driver support.
9. Final Verdict: Who Should Consider the R9 370 1024SP?
This graphics card is suitable for:
1. Budget Builds: If you need a PC for office work and video playback.
2. Retro Gamers: For playing games from the 2010s (Skyrim, GTA V).
3. Temporary Solutions: While saving for a modern GPU.
Why not buy new? Even if you find leftovers for $100, it's better to add $50–70 and get an Intel Arc A380 or AMD RX 6400 — they are more energy-efficient and support modern technologies.
The R9 370 1024SP is a relic, a reminder of GPU progress. It's still alive, but its time has long passed.