AMD Radeon R7 360

AMD Radeon R7 360: Budget GPU for Undemanding Tasks and Games
April 2025
Introduction
In a world where graphics cards with ray tracing support and 4K gaming dominate the market, the AMD Radeon R7 360 remains a niche solution for those seeking an affordable option for basic tasks. Despite its age (released in 2015), this model is still available for sale as a new entry-level product. In this article, we will explore who the R7 360 is suitable for in 2025 and what compromises must be made.
Architecture and Key Features
GCN 3.0: The Foundation for Budget Graphics
The Radeon R7 360 is built on the Graphics Core Next (GCN) 3.0 architecture with a 28 nm manufacturing process. This outdated production technology allowed AMD to reduce the cost of the card. At its core is the Tobago Pro chip with 768 stream processors and 48 texture units.
Unique Features: A Modest Set
- FidelityFX: Partial support via driver updates (only contrast-adaptive sharpening).
- FreeSync: Compatible with AMD monitors to eliminate screen tearing.
- Lack of RT and DLSS: Ray tracing and neural network technologies are not supported.
The card is oriented towards DirectX 12 and Vulkan, but optimization for modern APIs is limited due to low computational power.
Memory: GDDR5 Limitations
Type and Volume
The R7 360 is equipped with 2 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 128-bit bus. The bandwidth is 112 GB/s (7 GHz frequency).
Impact on Performance
- 1080p: Sufficient for gaming at low settings (e.g., CS:GO, Dota 2).
- Multitasking: 2 GB is critically insufficient for modern games (Hogwarts Legacy requires a minimum of 4 GB even on Low).
- Professional Applications: Rendering in Blender or working with 4K video in DaVinci Resolve will result in stuttering.
Gaming Performance
Average FPS (1080p, Medium Settings)
- CS:GO: ~90-120 FPS (depends on the scene).
- Fortnite: ~35-45 FPS (Performance mode).
- GTA V: ~40-50 FPS (without MSAA).
- The Witcher 3: ~25-30 FPS (only Low).
Resolutions Above 1080p
- 1440p: Not recommended — FPS drops by 40-50%.
- 4K: Unsuitable even for undemanding projects.
Ray Tracing
The lack of hardware support for RT cores makes it impossible to use ray tracing even through software emulation.
Professional Tasks
Video Editing
- Premiere Pro: Basic editing in 1080p with Proxy files.
- DaVinci Resolve: Issues with H.265 rendering and color grading.
3D Modeling
- Blender: Rendering on OpenCL is possible but 2-3 times slower than on modern GPUs.
- AutoCAD: Only suitable for 2D drawings.
Scientific Calculations
- OpenCL: Supported, but limited computational power negates advantages.
Power Consumption and Heat Generation
TDP and PSU Requirements
- TDP: 100 W.
- Recommended PSU: 400 W (e.g., EVGA 400 W1).
Cooling
- Standard Solution: Single fan (noise level up to 38 dB under load).
- Case Recommendations: At least one additional ventilation slot is mandatory.
Comparison with Competitors
AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Pros: 4 GB GDDR6, PCIe 4.0 support, lower power consumption (53 W).
- Cons: Price ($130) compared to $80 for R7 360.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Pros: 4 GB GDDR5, DLSS 1.0 support, better optimization for modern games.
- Cons: Priced at $150, which is nearly double the cost of R7 360.
Practical Tips
Power Supply
Minimum power reserve is 400 W. Avoid noname brands: models from Corsair (CV450) or Be Quiet! (System Power 10) are suitable.
Compatibility
- Platforms: Works with motherboards that support PCIe 3.0.
- Drivers: Use Adrenalin 24.4.1 (the latest version with optimizations for older GPUs).
Nuances
- Overclocking: Not advisable due to architectural limitations.
- Multi-Monitor Systems: Supports up to 3 displays (HDMI, DVI, DisplayPort).
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Price: $80 for a new card (e.g., ASUS R7 360-2GD5).
- Energy Efficiency: Suitable for older PCs with low-power PSUs.
- Quiet Operation: The fan stops during idle.
Cons
- Outdated Architecture: GCN 3.0 struggles with modern games.
- Memory Shortage: 2 GB is critically low even for browser-based projects in 2025.
Final Verdict: Who is the Radeon R7 360 Suitable For?
This graphics card is a choice for:
1. Owners of Office PCs looking to add support for 2D acceleration and light gaming.
2. Enthusiasts building budget systems (e.g., HTPC for streaming).
3. Users upgrading old computers with PSUs below 450 W.
However, if your budget allows spending $130-150, it is better to consider the RX 6400 or GTX 1650 — they will provide performance headroom for the next 2-3 years. The R7 360 in 2025 remains an option for extremely limited scenarios where price matters more than capabilities.
Prices are current as of April 2025. They are for new devices in retail stores in the USA.