AMD Radeon R9 M470X

AMD Radeon R9 M470X in 2025: Is This Graphics Card Worth Considering?
Introduction
Although the AMD Radeon R9 M470X was released nearly a decade ago, it is still found in budget builds and laptops. By 2025, this model is no longer relevant for modern tasks, but it can be considered a temporary solution for basic needs. Let’s explore who and why might find this GPU useful today.
1. Architecture and Key Features
Architecture: The R9 M470X is based on the GCN (Graphics Core Next) 3rd generation microarchitecture, which at the time offered a good balance between performance and energy efficiency.
Manufacturing Process: The card is built on a 28 nm manufacturing process, which appears outdated by today's standards (5-6 nm for 2025 flagship models). This limits its capabilities in energy efficiency and transistor density.
Unique Features:
- Support for AMD FidelityFX (contrast adaptive sharpening, detail enhancement).
- No hardware acceleration for ray tracing (RT cores) or DLSS equivalents.
- FreeSync technology for synchronizing frame rates with the monitor.
2. Memory: Type, Size, and Performance
Type and Size: The R9 M470X uses GDDR5 with a capacity of 4 GB. For 2025, this is insufficient even for medium settings in modern games.
Bandwidth: The 128-bit memory bus provides a bandwidth of 96 GB/s. In comparison, even budget cards in 2025 (like the AMD RX 7600) offer 224 GB/s thanks to GDDR6 and a 128-bit bus.
Impact on Performance: The limited amount and speed of memory create a bottleneck in games with high-detailed textures (e.g., _Horizon Forbidden West_ or _Starfield_). At 1080p, it is still possible to achieve 30-40 FPS on low settings, but at 1440p and 4K, the card will struggle.
3. Gaming Performance
FPS Examples (on low settings, 1080p):
- _Cyberpunk 2077_: 22–28 FPS (without ray tracing).
- _Elden Ring_: 30–35 FPS.
- _Fortnite_: 45–50 FPS (with FSR 1.0 on “Performance”).
- _CS2_: 60–70 FPS.
Supported Resolutions:
- 1080p: Acceptable for less demanding titles.
- 1440p and 4K: Not recommended due to lack of power and memory.
Ray Tracing: The absence of hardware support makes RT effects unavailable. Software emulation (such as through Proton on Linux) reduces FPS to unacceptable levels.
4. Professional Tasks
Video Editing: In basic editors (DaVinci Resolve, Premiere Pro), the card can handle rendering at resolutions up to 1080p, but for 4K or effects, a more modern GPU will be required.
3D Modeling: Programs like Blender or Maya will operate slowly due to limited computational power. Support for OpenCL exists, but its performance is 2-3 times lower than that of modern Radeon RX 7000 or NVIDIA RTX 4000.
Scientific Calculations: Not suitable for serious tasks. There are no NVIDIA CUDA cores, and AMD's OpenCL implementation is outdated.
5. Power Consumption and Heat Dissipation
TDP: 75–100 W. This is acceptable for laptop versions, but requires thoughtful cooling in desktops.
Cooling Recommendations:
- At least 2-3 fans for ventilation in the case.
- For desktop versions, coolers with a heatsink (e.g., Arctic Accelero Mono) are suitable.
Cases: The minimum recommended size is Micro-ATX with good airflow.
6. Comparison with Competitors
Analogues from 2016-2017:
- NVIDIA GTX 960M: Comparable in performance but benefits from more stable drivers.
- AMD RX 460: Better optimized for DirectX 12.
Modern Budget Alternatives (2025):
- Intel Arc A580 (~$180): Supports ray tracing, 8 GB GDDR6.
- AMD RX 7600 (~$250): 8 GB GDDR6, FSR 3.0, three times higher performance.
7. Practical Tips
Power Supply: A 400 W PSU is sufficient (e.g., be quiet! System Power 10).
Compatibility:
- PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Not compatible with new PCIe 5.0 standards without adapters.
Drivers: Official support from AMD ended in 2022. Enthusiast communities release unofficial updates, but stability is not guaranteed.
8. Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Low price (new units, if available, are $80–100).
- Supports FreeSync.
- Suitable for older games and office tasks.
Cons:
- No ray tracing or DLSS/FSR 3.0.
- High power consumption for its performance.
- Limited driver support.
9. Final Conclusion: Who is the R9 M470X Suitable For?
This graphics card is an option for:
1. Owners of older PCs looking to replace a burnt-out GPU without a full upgrade.
2. Users playing less demanding titles (indie games, classics from the 2010s).
3. Office systems where 3D graphics are not required.
However, for modern gaming, 4K editing, or working with neural networks, the R9 M470X is hopelessly outdated. In 2025, it is wiser to add $100–150 and select a new budget model that supports current technologies.
If you find the R9 M470X priced below $50 (used), it could be a decent temporary option. But remember: the future belongs to GPUs with FSR 3.0, AI acceleration, and energy efficiency.