AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP: A Review of the Budget Graphics Card of 2025
Analysis of capabilities, performance, and target audience
Introduction
The AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP is a graphics card that remains popular among budget segment enthusiasts even in 2025. Despite its age, it continues to attract users with its low power consumption and affordable price. But how relevant is it today? Let's delve into the details.
1. Architecture and Key Features
GCN 1.1 Architecture: A Legacy of the Past
The card is built on the Graphics Core Next (GCN) 1.1 architecture, released in 2014. This is the 4th generation of GCN, optimized for a balance between performance and energy efficiency.
- Process Technology: 28 nm — outdated by 2025 standards, where 6-7 nm chips dominate.
- Compute Units: 896 stream processors (SP) compared to 2048 in modern budget models like the RX 6500 XT.
- Features: Support for AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) 1.0, but lacks hardware support for ray tracing (RT) and FSR 3.0.
Unique Features:
- TrueAudio Next — audio processing via GPU (relevant for VR environment emulation).
- FreeSync — compatibility with monitors to eliminate screen tearing.
2. Memory: Modest Capabilities
Type and Volume:
- GDDR5 — an outdated standard (modern cards use GDDR6).
- 2 GB — critically low for games in 2025, where even indie projects require 4-6 GB.
Bandwidth:
- 128-bit bus + speed of 6 Gbps = 96 GB/s. For comparison: RX 6400 (GDDR6) — 144 GB/s.
Impact on Performance:
The lack of memory results in a drop in FPS in games with high-resolution textures (e.g., Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield) even on low settings.
3. Gaming Performance: 1080p at Minimal Settings Only
Examples of FPS (Medium Settings, 1080p):
- Fortnite: 45–55 FPS (with FSR 1.0).
- Apex Legends: 40–50 FPS.
- CS2: 70–90 FPS.
- The Witcher 3: 30–35 FPS.
Resolutions:
- 1080p: Comfortable for games up to 2022, new titles — at low settings.
- 1440p and 4K: Not recommended — lack of memory and compute power.
Ray Tracing:
Not supported due to the absence of RT cores. Software methods (e.g., FSR + RT) yield unacceptably low FPS (10–15 frames).
4. Professional Tasks: Minimum for Basic Tasks
- Video Editing: Suitable for working in DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro with 1080p videos, but 4K rendering will take 2-3 times longer than on a modern card.
- 3D Modeling: Handles basic scenes in Blender and Maya, but complex projects require more memory.
- OpenCL: Supported, but performance is lower than that of NVIDIA GTX 1650 (CUDA).
Conclusion: The card is suitable for students and beginner specialists, but not for professionals.
5. Power Consumption and Thermal Output
- TDP: 100 W — one of the main advantages of the model.
- Cooling: Passive or single-slot coolers manage under load up to 70-75°C.
- Recommendations:
- Case with 1–2 fans for ventilation.
- Power supply of at least 400 W (e.g., Corsair CV450).
6. Comparison with Competitors
2025 Analogues:
- NVIDIA GTX 1650 (4 GB): 20-30% faster in games, priced at $130–150.
- AMD RX 6400 (4 GB): Supports FSR 3.0 and RDNA 2, priced at $140–160.
- Intel Arc A380 (6 GB): Better performance in DX12 but requires a modern CPU.
Conclusion: The R7 360 falls behind even budget newcomers but is cheaper ($80–100).
7. Practical Tips
- Power Supply: 450 W with 80+ Bronze certification.
- Compatibility:
- PCIe 3.0 x16 (backward compatible with 2.0).
- Recommended CPU is Ryzen 3 3100 or Core i3-10100.
- Drivers: Use Adrenalin 24.x — they are stable, but do not expect optimizations for new games.
8. Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Price $80–100.
- Low power consumption.
- Quiet operation.
Cons:
- Only 2 GB of memory.
- No support for modern technologies (FSR 3.0, RT).
- Weak performance in new games.
9. Final Conclusion: Who is the R7 360 For?
This graphics card is suitable for:
1. Budget Builds: If you need a PC for office work, study, or video watching.
2. Retro Gamers: For running games from the 2010s at high settings.
3. Temporary Solution: While you save up for a modern model.
Why You Shouldn't Buy It: If you plan to play new releases in 2025 or work with 3D rendering.
Conclusion
The Radeon R7 360 896SP in 2025 is a niche product. It is not suitable for hardcore use but will serve as a lifeline for those seeking an inexpensive and reliable solution for basic tasks. However, if your budget allows you to spend $30–50 more, it’s better to look at the RX 6400 or GTX 1650 — they will provide a better future-proof solution.