AMD Radeon R7 250X

AMD Radeon R7 250X in 2025: Budget Veteran or Obsolete Solution?
An overview of the capabilities, performance, and relevance of the graphics card years later.
1. Architecture and Key Features
GCN 1.0 Architecture: Foundations of Reliability
The AMD Radeon R7 250X, released in 2014, is based on the first generation of Graphics Core Next (GCN) architecture. This design has provided the card with longevity, but in 2025, its capabilities appear modest. The manufacturing process is 28 nm, significantly lagging behind modern 5–7 nm chips. The number of stream processors is 640, and the base clock frequency is up to 1000 MHz.
Support for Technologies: Minimal Modern Features
The card does not support ray tracing, DLSS, or FidelityFX Super Resolution. However, it is compatible with Mantle (an outdated API) and partially with Vulkan, allowing it to run some modern games at low settings. Among relevant features is FreeSync support, which is beneficial for AMD monitor owners with refresh rates up to 75 Hz.
2. Memory: Modest Specs for Modern Tasks
GDDR5 and 2 GB: Limitations Are Evident
The R7 250X is equipped with 2 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 128-bit bus. The bandwidth is 96 GB/s. For games in 2025, this is insufficient: even at Full HD, high-quality textures and effects quickly exhaust the VRAM capacity. In professional tasks (such as rendering), the memory limitation becomes critical.
Tip: For games up to 2018 (e.g., The Witcher 3), 2 GB is sufficient at medium settings in 1080p (30–40 FPS). However, in projects like Cyberpunk 2077 (with patches from 2024-2025), the card barely reaches 15–20 FPS even at minimum settings.
3. Gaming Performance: Only for Undemanding Projects
1080p: Comfortable in Older Games
- CS:GO — 90–120 FPS (low settings).
- Fortnite — 40–50 FPS (Low, 720p).
- GTA V — 35–45 FPS (medium settings).
1440p and 4K: Not Recommended
Even with FSR 1.0 (support for which is limited by drivers), resolutions above 1080p lead to FPS drops below 30. Ray tracing is absent in hardware, and software emulation is impractical due to CPU load.
4. Professional Tasks: Very Limited Niche
OpenCL and Rendering: Minimal Efficiency
The card supports OpenCL 1.2, allowing it to be used for basic tasks:
- Video editing in DaVinci Resolve (projects up to 1080p, without complex effects).
- Simple 3D models in Blender (rendering will take 5–10 times longer than on modern GPUs).
NVIDIA CUDA: An Alternative for Professionals
For comparison, even a budget NVIDIA GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6) on CUDA shows 3–4 times better performance in rendering.
5. Power Consumption and Heat Dissipation: A Plus for Old PCs
TDP 95 W: Undemanding on Power
The card does not require a powerful PSU: a 350-400 W unit with a 6-pin connector is sufficient.
Cooling: Quiet but Weak System
The standard cooler handles the load (up to 75°C under stress), but overheating may occur in compact cases. A case with 1–2 intake fans is recommended.
6. Comparison with Competitors: The Budget Battle
Analogues from 2014-2016:
- NVIDIA GTX 750 Ti (2 GB GDDR5): Comparable in gaming, but wins due to driver optimization.
- AMD R7 370 (4 GB GDDR5): 20-30% more powerful but rarely found in new condition.
Modern Competitors in 2025:
- AMD Radeon RX 6400 (4 GB GDDR6, $120): 3–4 times faster, supports FSR 3.0 and RDNA 2.
- Intel Arc A310 (4 GB GDDR6, $100): Better in DX12 and streaming.
7. Practical Tips: Who is R7 250X Relevant For?
Power Supply: 400 W is sufficient (e.g., EVGA 400 W1).
Compatibility: PCIe 3.0 x16, works on Intel 4th generation platforms and newer, AMD AM4.
Drivers: AMD officially ended support in 2023. Use the last available versions (Adrenalin 21.6.1) or community mods.
Important: The card does not support Windows 11 with TPM 2.0 enabled without patches.
8. Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Low price ($50–70 for new units in 2025).
- Energy efficiency.
- FreeSync support.
Cons:
- No support for modern APIs (DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.3).
- Limited memory capacity.
- Absence of upscaling technologies (FSR 2.0/3.0).
9. Final Verdict: Who Should Consider the R7 250X?
This graphics card is a choice for:
1. Owners of Old PCs who want to upgrade without replacing the PSU.
2. Retro Gaming Enthusiasts (pre-2015).
3. Office Tasks and HD Video: Supports 4K decoding via HDMI 1.4a.
Alternative: If the budget allows for $100–150, it’s better to opt for a new Radeon RX 6400 or Intel Arc A310—they provide future-proofing.
Conclusion
The Radeon R7 250X in 2025 is a niche solution for very limited scenarios. It should only be considered as a temporary option or for specific tasks. Modern budget GPUs offer significantly more for a small additional cost.