Intel Core i5-2467M

Intel Core i5-2467M: Overview of an Ultramobile Processor for Basic Tasks
April 2025
Introduction
The Intel Core i5-2467M is a processor from the ultrabook era of the early 2010s, designed to balance performance and energy efficiency. Despite its age, devices featuring this CPU are still available on the market as budget solutions (new models from lesser-known brands range from $250 to $400). Let's explore who might benefit from it in 2025 and who should consider more modern alternatives.
Architecture and Fabrication Process
Sandy Bridge: The Basics
The processor was released in 2011 and is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (32 nm):
- 2 cores / 4 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading.
- Base frequency: 1.6 GHz, Turbo Boost: up to 2.3 GHz (for one core).
- Cache: 3 MB L3.
- Integrated graphics: Intel HD Graphics 3000 (12 EU, 350–1150 MHz).
Architecture Features
- Support for AVX — acceleration of calculations for media tasks.
- Integrated memory controller for DDR3-1333.
- Improved IPC (instructions per clock) by 10–15% compared to the previous generation.
The iGPU HD Graphics 3000 could handle HD video and simple games like Minecraft (2011), but is unsuitable for modern projects.
Power Consumption and TDP
- TDP: 17 W — typical for ultrabooks of its time.
- Actual power consumption: up to 20 W under load.
For comparison:
- Modern Intel U-series CPUs (2025) have TDP ratings of 9–15 W with 4–6 cores.
- Competitors from 2011: AMD A6-4455M (17 W, 2 cores) — less energy-efficient due to poor optimization.
Performance in Real-World Tasks
Office Work
- Google Docs, Excel: CPU load — 20–30%.
- Multitasking: 10+ tabs in Chrome + messaging apps may lead to occasional slowdowns.
Multimedia
- Video: Streaming 1080p — no problems. 4K — not supported hardware-wise.
- Editing: Editing in Shotcut or DaVinci Resolve — long rendering times (for example, a 10-minute 1080p video encodes in ~15–20 minutes).
Gaming
- Games from 2010–2012: Half-Life 2, Left 4 Dead 2 — 30–40 FPS on medium settings.
- Modern titles: Even Among Us (2020) may require resolution reductions to 720p.
Turbo Boost: Pros and Cons
- A brief boost to 2.3 GHz helps with sudden loads (like opening a large file).
- With prolonged tasks (such as rendering), the frequency drops to 1.8–2.0 GHz due to overheating.
Usage Scenarios
The processor is relevant for:
1. Students — working with texts, presentations, online courses.
2. Office workers — basic tasks that do not require multitasking.
3. General users — web surfing, YouTube, and social media.
Not suitable for:
- Gamers.
- Video editors.
- Programmers dealing with large project compilations.
Battery Life
- Average working time: 5–7 hours (with a battery capacity of 40–50 Wh).
- Power-saving technologies:
- Intel SpeedStep — dynamic frequency adjustment.
- C-states — shutdown of unused components.
- HD Graphics Power Saving — reducing GPU load.
Tip: Disabling Turbo Boost in the OS settings can increase battery life by 15–20%.
Comparison with Competitors
AMD A6-4455M (2012)
- 2 cores / 2 threads, 2.1–2.6 GHz.
- Radeon HD 7500G — graphics at the level of HD 3000.
- Poorer driver optimization → suffers in stability.
Apple MacBook Air (2011)
- Uses Intel Core i5-2467M.
- macOS manages power consumption better → battery life up to 8 hours.
Intel Core i3-10110U (2020)
- 2 cores / 4 threads, 2.1–4.1 GHz.
- Geekbench 6: 1100/2100 (Single/Multi) → three times faster.
- New laptops with it cost $400–$500.
Pros and Cons
Strengths:
- Low cost of devices.
- Sufficient performance for basic tasks.
- Compact and lightweight laptop designs.
Weaknesses:
- No support for Windows 11 (only unofficial patches).
- Lack of hardware decoding for VP9/AV1 → struggles with 4K YouTube.
- Limited upgrade potential: maximum 8–16 GB DDR3 and SATA SSD.
Laptop Selection Recommendations
Types of Devices
- Ultrabooks: ASUS Zenbook UX21 (2011), Dell XPS 13 (2012).
- Budget laptops: Modern models from Chuwi or Teclast ($250–$350).
What to Look For
1. Screen: IPS matrix vs outdated TN (better viewing angles).
2. Storage: Only SSD (SATA is sufficient). HDD is unacceptable.
3. RAM: At least 8 GB (4 GB is insufficient for Windows 10/11).
4. Battery: Battery replacement is essential — older cells hold charge poorly.
Final Conclusion
The Intel Core i5-2467M in 2025 is a choice for:
- Users with a budget of up to $300.
- Those needing a compact laptop for reading, internet browsing, and document work.
- Enthusiasts willing to accept limitations for portability.
Key benefits:
- Affordability.
- Proven reliability (after battery replacement and SSD installation).
- Compatibility with Linux (for example, Ubuntu or Mint is better optimized for older CPUs).
Alternative: If the budget allows for an additional $100–150, consider laptops with the Intel N100 (2023) — 4 cores, AV1 support, 6 W TDP, Geekbench 6 Multi-Core ~1800.
Conclusion
The Core i5-2467M is an example of a "workhorse" that has remained relevant for niche scenarios even after 14 years. However, in the age of AI chips and 5-nm fabrication processes, it should be seen only as a temporary solution.