AMD A6-5200

AMD A6-5200

AMD A6-5200 Kabini: Budget Processor for Basic Tasks in 2025

April 2025


1. Architecture and Fabrication Process: The Jaguar Era

The AMD A6-5200 processor, released in 2013 and based on the Jaguar architecture, is part of the Kabini lineup designed for budget laptops and compact PCs. Despite its age, it is still found in some new entry-level devices.

- Cores and Threads: 4 cores, 4 threads (no Hyper-Threading support).

- Clock Speeds: Base clock of 2.0 GHz, turbo mode up to 2.8 GHz (activated briefly under low load).

- Fabrication Process: 28 nm - an outdated standard even for 2025, impacting energy efficiency.

- Integrated Graphics: Radeon HD 8400 with 128 shader processors and a frequency of 600 MHz. Supports DirectX 11, but struggles with modern APIs like Vulkan or DirectX 12.

The Jaguar architecture was initially designed for consoles (e.g., PS4), but its potential in mobile processors is limited. The main focus is on multithreading rather than single-task execution speed.


2. Power Consumption and TDP: Modest Appetite

With a TDP of 25 W, the A6-5200 is positioned as a processor for thin laptops. However, this is a high figure by modern standards:

- For comparison: Intel Core i3-1315U (2025) has a TDP of 15 W with double the performance.

- Heat Dissipation: Even with passive cooling (fanless), the processor can overheat under prolonged load, leading to throttling.

Systems with the A6-5200 often come equipped with compact coolers, which increases noise during operation.


3. Performance: Real-World Scenarios

Geekbench 6 results (215 Single-Core / 611 Multi-Core) place the A6-5200 alongside modern ARM processors used in budget tablets.

- Office Work:

- Google Docs, Excel with spreadsheets up to 1000 rows — acceptable, but with delays during complex formulas.

- Opening 10+ tabs in the browser simultaneously will cause stuttering.

- Multimedia:

- Watching 1080p videos (YouTube, Netflix) — no problems.

- 4K videos or streaming in high quality — unsupported.

- Gaming:

- Older games (Half-Life 2, Minecraft on low settings) — 30-40 FPS.

- Modern titles (Cyberpunk 2077, Fortnite) — will not run even on minimum settings.

- Turbo Mode: Briefly boosts to 2.8 GHz helps with short tasks (OS boot, application launches), but under sustained load, the frequency drops back to base.


4. Usage Scenarios: Who Is It Suitable For?

The A6-5200 is relevant in 2025 only in two cases:

1. Ultra-Budget Laptops ($250-$350): For users who need a device for "email and YouTube."

2. Office Terminals: In corporate environments where running legacy software is required.

Not Suitable For:

- Students for 3D modeling or programming.

- Gamers and designers.


5. Battery Life: How Long Will It Last?

With a battery capacity of 40-45 Wh, the operating time will be:

- 4-5 hours: Web surfing, text work.

- 3 hours: Video viewing.

Power-saving Technologies:

- AMD PowerNow!: Dynamic frequency adjustment for cores.

- C6 States: Disabling unused cores.

However, the outdated 28 nm fabrication process negates the benefits of these technologies. Modern processors (e.g., AMD Ryzen 3 8300U) last 2-3 hours longer under similar tasks.


6. Comparison with Competitors: Who Are the Leaders?

- AMD Athlon Silver 7120U (2024): 2 cores / 4 threads, 15 W TDP, Geekbench 6 Single-Core — 890. Laptop prices: starting from $400.

- Intel Celeron N5100 (2021): 4 cores, 6 W TDP, integrated Intel UHD graphics. Lags in multithreading but is more energy-efficient.

- Apple M1 (2020): Single-threaded performance is 4 times higher. Laptops with M1 now start at $600, making them more cost-effective even in the secondary market.

Conclusion: The A6-5200 lags behind even budget models from 2022-2024.


7. Pros and Cons

Strengths:

- Low price of devices.

- Support for multithreading (4 cores).

- Sufficient power for basic tasks.

Weaknesses:

- Outdated architecture and fabrication process.

- Low performance in single-threaded tasks.

- Lack of support for modern standards (USB-C, PCIe 4.0).


8. Laptop Purchase Recommendations

If you are still considering a device with the A6-5200, note the following:

- Type of Device: Ultrabooks with a 13-14 inch display (e.g., HP 255 G8).

- SSD: Must be 256 GB (SATA or NVMe).

- RAM: At least 8 GB DDR3.

- Display: IPS matrix for comfortable work.

Prices in 2025:

- New laptops with A6-5200 — $280-$400.

- For $450-$600, you can find models with Ryzen 3 7300U or Intel Core i3-1315U offering better performance.


9. Final Verdict: Is It Worth Buying?

In 2025, the AMD A6-5200 is a choice for those who:

- Are looking for an extremely cheap laptop for basic tasks.

- Do not plan to use it for more than 2-3 years.

Key Advantages:

- Cost savings at the start ($250-$350).

- Support for basic functions of Windows 11 (with limitations).

Recommendation: If the budget allows for an additional $100-150, choose devices with AMD Ryzen 3 or Intel Core i3 — they will last longer and will not disappoint in the future.


Conclusion: The A6-5200 is a relic of the past that may still find use in specific scenarios. However, for most users, modern alternatives will be a more sensible investment.

Basic

Label Name
AMD
Platform
Mobile
Launch Date
May 2013
Model Name
?
The Intel processor number is just one of several factors - along with processor brand, system configurations, and system-level benchmarks - to be considered when choosing the right processor for your computing needs.
A6-5200
Code Name
Kabini
Generation
A6 (Kabini)

CPU Specifications

Total Cores
?
Cores is a hardware term that describes the number of independent central processing units in a single computing component (die or chip).
4
Total Threads
?
Where applicable, Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology is only available on Performance-cores.
4
Basic Frequency
2000 MHz
Max Turbo Frequency
?
Max Turbo Frequency is the maximum single-core frequency at which the processor is capable of operating using Intel® Turbo Boost Technology and, if present, Intel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 and Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost. Frequency is typically measured in gigahertz (GHz), or billion cycles per second.
N/A
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
Multiplier
20.0x
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
CPU Socket
?
The socket is the component that provides the mechanical and electrical connections between the processor and motherboard.
AMD Socket FT3
Multiplier Unlocked
No
Technology
?
Lithography refers to the semiconductor technology used to manufacture an integrated circuit, and is reported in nanometer (nm), indicative of the size of features built on the semiconductor.
28 nm
TDP
25 W
PCI Express Version
?
PCI Express Revision is the supported version of the PCI Express standard. Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (or PCIe) is a high-speed serial computer expansion bus standard for attaching hardware devices to a computer. The different PCI Express versions support different data rates.
Gen 2, 4 Lanes (CPU only)

Memory Specifications

Memory Type
?
Intel® processors come in four different types: Single Channel, Dual Channel, Triple Channel, and Flex Mode. Maximum supported memory speed may be lower when populating multiple DIMMs per channel on products that support multiple memory channels.
DDR3
Memory Channels
?
The number of memory channels refers to the bandwidth operation for real world application.
Single-channel
ECC Memory
No

GPU Specifications

Integrated Graphics Model
?
An integrated GPU refers to the graphics core that is integrated into the CPU processor. Leveraging the processor's powerful computational capabilities and intelligent power efficiency management, it delivers outstanding graphics performance and a smooth application experience at a lower power consumption.
Radeon HD 8400

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
215
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
611
Geekbench 5
Single Core Score
239
Geekbench 5
Multi Core Score
729
Passmark CPU
Single Core Score
662
Passmark CPU
Multi Core Score
1661

Compared to Other CPU

Geekbench 6 Single Core
357 +66%
313 +45.6%
257 +19.5%
215
32 -85.1%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
847 +38.6%
704 +15.2%
611
509 -16.7%
341 -44.2%
Geekbench 5 Single Core
335 +40.2%
298 +24.7%
243 +1.7%
239
59 -75.3%
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
879 +20.6%
820 +12.5%
729
626 -14.1%
519 -28.8%
Passmark CPU Single Core
890 +34.4%
777 +17.4%
662
538 -18.7%
375 -43.4%
Passmark CPU Multi Core
1973 +18.8%
1853 +11.6%
1661
1520 -8.5%
1367 -17.7%