Intel Celeron N2910

Intel Celeron N2910

Intel Celeron N2910: A Budget Processor for Basic Tasks — 2025 Review

Introduction

Even in 2025, ultra-budget laptops remain on the market, positioned as "devices for basic tasks." One such solution is the Intel Celeron N2910 processor, released back in the mid-2010s. Despite its archaic architecture, this chip still appears in new laptops priced between $200 and $300. Let's explore who might find it useful and who should look for alternatives.


1. Architecture and Process Technology: An Outdated Platform

Bay Trail-M: The 22 nm Era

The Celeron N2910 is built on the Bay Trail-M architecture, which debuted in 2013. It is manufactured using a 22-nanometer process technology, which seems outdated in 2025 compared to the 5–7 nm process of modern chips. The processor features 4 cores and 4 threads (without Hyper-Threading support), operating at a base frequency of 1.6 GHz with no turbo mode. The Silvermont cores that form the basis of Bay Trail are optimized for low power consumption, but their IPC (instructions per clock) is significantly lower than that of contemporary Intel or AMD cores.

Integrated Graphics

The integrated GPU is Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail generation) with 4 execution units (EUs) and a frequency of up to 756 MHz. This solution is suitable only for basic image output and 1080p video decoding. Even the simplest 3D games like Minecraft at minimum settings will barely be playable.


2. TDP of 7W: Silence and Compactness at the Cost of Performance

The nominal TDP of the processor is 7W, allowing it to operate without active cooling. This is a key advantage of the chip: laptops equipped with it are thin (up to 15 mm) and completely silent. However, the low TDP imposes strict performance limitations — the processor cannot sustain high frequencies for long due to overheating. In Cinebench R23 tests, the N2910 achieves around 200 points in multi-threaded workloads, which is 10 times lower than a budget Intel Core i3 from the 13th generation.


3. Performance: Just the Basics

Office Tasks

- Web Browsing: Struggles with 5–7 tabs open in Chrome. Pages with heavy JavaScript (like Google Docs) might lag.

- Document Editing: Word, Excel — acceptable, but opening files with many formulas or charts takes time.

- Video Calls: Zoom or Google Meet works at minimal settings (720p). Background blur or virtual backgrounds cause lag.

Multimedia

- Video: 1080p decoding via hardware codecs (H.264), but it cannot handle 4K or VP9.

- Audio: No problems.

- Image Editing: Only basic operations in apps like Paint.NET. Photoshop CC 2025 will be unbearably slow.

Gaming

- Older Games: Half-Life 2 (2004) — 30–40 FPS at low settings.

- Indie Projects: Stardew Valley — playable, but freezing may occur.

- Cloud Gaming: The only option for modern games (with stable internet).


4. Use Cases: Who is the N2910 For?

- Students for note-taking and online courses.

- Older users who need a cheap laptop for email and Skype.

- Travelers who value portability and battery life.

- Corporate clients for terminals in offices or warehouses.

Categorically Unsuitable For:

- Freelancers working with graphics.

- Gamers (except retro game enthusiasts).

- Anyone using multiple programs simultaneously (e.g., browser + Excel + messengers).


5. Battery Life: Is 10 Hours a Myth or Reality?

With a battery capacity of 40–45 Wh (typical for budget models), the N2910 provides 6–8 hours of usage in document reading mode. However, with active Wi-Fi use and screen backlighting, this time shrinks to 4–5 hours. Energy-saving technologies are limited:

- Intel SpeedStep — dynamic frequency management.

- C-states — voltage reduction during idle time.

But due to the outdated architecture, the efficiency of these methods is lower than that of modern processors.


6. Comparison with Competitors

AMD Athlon Silver 3050e (2020):

- 2 cores / 4 threads, 6W TDP.

- Geekbench 6 score: 550 (Single), 1100 (Multi).

- Laptop prices: starting at $350.

Apple M1 (2020):

- Even the 5-year-old M1 outperforms the N2910 by 8 times.

- Laptops with M1 are now priced from $500 (new).

Intel Celeron N5100 (2021):

- 4 cores / 4 threads, 10nm, 6W TDP.

- Geekbench 6: 650 (Single), 1800 (Multi).

Conclusion: The N2910 lags behind even budget models from 2020-2021.


7. Pros and Cons

Strengths:

- Laptop prices starting from $200.

- Passive cooling (no noise).

- Sufficient for basic tasks.

Weaknesses:

- Low performance.

- No support for modern standards (USB-C, Wi-Fi 6).

- Maximum of 8 GB of RAM (often comes with 4 GB).


8. Laptop Selection Recommendations

What to Look For:

- RAM: At least 8 GB. 4 GB in 2025 is torture even for Windows 11 Lite.

- Storage: Only SSD (256 GB). HDDs are a red flag.

- Screen: 1920×1080 resolution is rare in this segment, but 1366×768 is acceptable for text.

Examples of 2025 Models:

- HP Stream 14: $229, 4 GB RAM, 128 GB eMMC.

- Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1: $279, 8 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD.

Tip: If your budget allows $400, opt for laptops with Intel N100 (Alder Lake-N) or AMD Ryzen 3 7320U — they are 3–4 times faster.


9. Final Conclusion: Who Should Buy?

The Celeron N2910 is an option for those who:

- Are looking for the cheapest device for text and internet use.

- Do not plan to use the laptop for more than 2–3 years.

- Value silence and lightness (device weight is 1–1.3 kg).

Key Benefits:

- Price under $300.

- Battery life of 6+ hours.

- Compactness.

However, keep in mind: even budget Chromebooks with ARM processors at the same price will offer smoother performance. The N2910 is a last-resort economy choice, justified only for very tight budgets.

Basic

Label Name
Intel
Platform
Mobile
Launch Date
September 2013
Model Name
?
The Intel processor number is just one of several factors - along with processor brand, system configurations, and system-level benchmarks - to be considered when choosing the right processor for your computing needs.
Celeron N2910
Code Name
Bay Trail-M
Generation
Celeron (Bay Trail)

CPU Specifications

Total Cores
?
Cores is a hardware term that describes the number of independent central processing units in a single computing component (die or chip).
4
Total Threads
?
Where applicable, Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology is only available on Performance-cores.
4
Basic Frequency
1600 MHz
Max Turbo Frequency
?
Max Turbo Frequency is the maximum single-core frequency at which the processor is capable of operating using Intel® Turbo Boost Technology and, if present, Intel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 and Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost. Frequency is typically measured in gigahertz (GHz), or billion cycles per second.
N/A
L1 Cache
56 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
CPU Socket
?
The socket is the component that provides the mechanical and electrical connections between the processor and motherboard.
Intel BGA 1170
Multiplier Unlocked
No
Technology
?
Lithography refers to the semiconductor technology used to manufacture an integrated circuit, and is reported in nanometer (nm), indicative of the size of features built on the semiconductor.
22 nm
TDP
7 W

Memory Specifications

Memory Type
?
Intel® processors come in four different types: Single Channel, Dual Channel, Triple Channel, and Flex Mode. Maximum supported memory speed may be lower when populating multiple DIMMs per channel on products that support multiple memory channels.
DDR3
ECC Memory
No

GPU Specifications

Integrated Graphics Model
?
An integrated GPU refers to the graphics core that is integrated into the CPU processor. Leveraging the processor's powerful computational capabilities and intelligent power efficiency management, it delivers outstanding graphics performance and a smooth application experience at a lower power consumption.
HD Graphics

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
101
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
212
Geekbench 5
Single Core Score
135
Geekbench 5
Multi Core Score
460
Passmark CPU
Single Core Score
447
Passmark CPU
Multi Core Score
773

Compared to Other CPU

Geekbench 6 Single Core
357 +253.5%
313 +209.9%
257 +154.5%
180 +78.2%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
693 +226.9%
601 +183.5%
500 +135.8%
336 +58.5%
Geekbench 5 Single Core
335 +148.1%
298 +120.7%
243 +80%
177 +31.1%
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
688 +49.6%
588 +27.8%
471 +2.4%
94 -79.6%
Passmark CPU Single Core
822 +83.9%
703 +57.3%
588 +31.5%
458 +2.5%
Passmark CPU Multi Core
1172 +51.6%
1006 +30.1%
561 -27.4%
335 -56.7%