Intel Celeron 887

Intel Celeron 887: Budget Processor for Basic Tasks in 2025
An analysis of the capabilities and relevance of an outdated chip in the era of modern technologies.
1. Architecture and Manufacturing Process: The Legacy of Sandy Bridge
The Intel Celeron 887 processor, released in 2011, is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture—the second generation of Intel Core. This is a 32nm dual-core chip without Hyper-Threading support, which means it has 2 threads. The processor's base frequency is 1.5 GHz, and there is no turbo mode, as Turbo Boost technology was disabled in the Celeron line to reduce costs.
Integrated graphics are represented by Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) with 6 execution units (EUs) and a frequency of up to 1000 MHz. This allows for the processing of 1080p video, but the power is insufficient for gaming or rendering. The L3 cache is limited to 2 MB, significantly lower than the Core i3/i5 of the same generation (3–6 MB).
Example: In 2025, such specifications appear archaic. In comparison, modern budget chips, like the Intel Celeron N5100 (Jasper Lake, 10nm), feature 4 cores, 4 threads, and a 4 MB L2 cache.
2. Power Consumption and TDP: Savings through Limitations
The TDP of the Celeron 887 is 17W, typical for mobile processors from the Sandy Bridge era. This allowed the chip to be used in thin laptops and netbooks, but even by 2025 standards, its energy efficiency leaves much to be desired. Modern counterparts, like the AMD Athlon Silver 7120U (6nm, TDP 15W), demonstrate twice the performance at a similar thermal package.
Tip: Laptops with the Celeron 887 were often equipped with passive cooling, reducing noise but limiting performance under sustained loads.
3. Performance: Real Tasks and Limitations
Results from Geekbench 6 (Single-Core: 259, Multi-Core: 372) show that the processor can only handle the simplest tasks:
- Office work: Word, Excel, and a browser with 2-3 tabs.
- Multimedia: Watching YouTube videos (1080p) is possible, but streaming 4K or HDR is not.
- Gaming: Only older 2D games (like Stardew Valley) or early 2000s games at low settings.
Example: Running Zoom + a browser + a messenger will lead to noticeable lags.
4. Use Cases: Who Is the Celeron 887 Suitable for in 2025?
- Students for typing and working with PDFs.
- Older users who need a cheap laptop for communication and reading news.
- Office "workhorses" with pre-installed Linux for basic tasks.
Important: Do not consider this processor for graphic work, video editing, or modern applications like Figma.
5. Battery Life: Battery vs. Architectural Limitations
With a TDP of 17W and no modern power-saving technologies (such as those found in Intel's 7nm Alder Lake-U), laptops with the Celeron 887 in 2025 can run for 3-5 hours with a new battery. Features like SpeedStep dynamically adjust the frequency, but the outdated 32nm manufacturing process lags behind modern chips in efficiency.
Tip: Replace HDD with SSD and upgrade RAM to 8 GB—this will extend battery life by reducing the load on the processor.
6. Comparison with Competitors: Who Are the Leaders?
- AMD E2-9000 (2017, 28nm): A weak APU but supports more modern video codecs.
- Intel Celeron N4020 (2019, 14nm): 2 cores, 2 threads, but is 30% faster in multi-threaded tasks.
- Apple M1 (2020, 5nm): A system-on-chip that outperforms by 5-7 times.
Conclusion: Even budget modern processors (starting from $300) surpass the Celeron 887 in all parameters.
7. Pros and Cons: Is It Worth Buying?
Pros:
- Very low price (laptops starting from $200, if new models are still available).
- Support for basic operating systems: Windows 10 LTSC, Linux (Lubuntu).
Cons:
- No support for AVX, AES-NI, and other modern instructions.
- Maximum 16 GB DDR3-1333 MHz — a bottleneck for multitasking.
8. Recommendations for Choosing a Laptop
If you still decide to buy a device with a Celeron 887, pay attention to:
- Type of Device: Budget laptops (Acer Aspire ES1, Lenovo IdeaPad 100).
- SSD instead of HDD: A must! This will significantly speed up the system.
- Display: IPS matrix with a resolution of 1366x768—minimum for comfort.
Warning: Do not buy models with 2 GB RAM—they are unsuitable even for browsing in 2025.
9. Final Conclusion: Who Is This Processor For?
The Intel Celeron 887 in 2025 is suitable for those who:
- Are looking for an ultra-budget device under $250 for typing and internet use.
- Do not plan to use modern applications.
- Are willing to compromise with limitations for the price.
Alternative: For $300-400, you can buy a laptop based on the Intel Celeron N4500 or AMD Athlon Silver 3050U with support for Wi-Fi 6, NVMe SSD, and a Full HD display.
Conclusion: The Celeron 887 is a relic of the past, maintaining relevance only in the niche of "digital minimalism." In a world where even budget Chromebooks offer more, such a processor should only be chosen in extreme cases.