Intel Celeron 857

Intel Celeron 857: A Budget Processor for Basic Tasks. Full Review
Introduction
In an era where even budget laptops are equipped with quad-core processors and neural network accelerators, the Intel Celeron 857 seems like an anachronism. However, this chip is still found in ultra-budget devices. Let's explore who it might be useful for in 2025 and who should look for alternatives.
Architecture and Process Technology: Sandy Bridge in the Modern World
The Intel Celeron 857 processor, released in 2012, is based on the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture and manufactured using a 32nm process technology. This dual-core CPU lacks Hyper-Threading support (2 cores / 2 threads) and has a base frequency of 1.2 GHz. The integrated graphics are provided by Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) with a frequency of 350–1000 MHz.
Key Features:
- Outdated 32nm process compared to modern norms of 7nm (AMD) and 5nm (Apple).
- No support for AVX, AES-NI, and other modern instructions.
- The HD Graphics (12 execution units) can only handle basic tasks such as displaying images and decoding 1080p video.
Why Does This Matter?
The 32nm process means high power consumption per unit of performance. For comparison, the modern Intel Core Ultra 5 (7nm), at a similar TDP, delivers 5 to 7 times more computational power.
Power Consumption and TDP: Modest Appetite
The TDP of the processor is 17W, typical for mobile solutions of the 2010s. However, the actual power consumption depends on the load:
- In idle mode: 2–3W (thanks to Enhanced Intel SpeedStep technology).
- Under maximum load: up to 20W.
Practical Conclusion:
Laptops with the Celeron 857 typically come with compact coolers and passive cooling. There is almost no noise, but throttling may occur under prolonged loads.
Performance: Realistic Expectations
Geekbench 6 test results:
- Single-Core: 133
- Multi-Core: 199
Real-World Scenarios:
1. Office Tasks (Google Docs, Excel with spreadsheets up to 1000 rows): Acceptable speed, but with delays when running a browser with 5+ tabs simultaneously.
2. Multimedia: Watching YouTube at 1080p is possible, but 4K will lag.
3. Gaming: Only older 2D games (Terraria, Stardew Valley) on low settings. CS:GO runs at 15–20 FPS at 720p.
Turbo Mode: Non-existent. The frequency is fixed at 1.2 GHz, which limits performance under short bursts of load.
Use Cases: Who is the Celeron 857 Suitable For?
1. Students for typing, working with PDFs, and Zoom meetings (without background filters).
2. Seniors who need simple internet browsing and messaging.
3. Cashiers working with 1C and basic POS systems.
Who Should Avoid It:
- Freelancers (slow rendering even in Canva).
- Gamers (except for fans of text quests).
- Photographers (editing RAW files in Lightroom is impossible).
Battery Life: Compromise Between Power and Work Time
Laptops with the Celeron 857 generally come with 35–40 Wh batteries, providing:
- 6–8 hours of document work (50% brightness, Wi-Fi on).
- 3–4 hours of YouTube viewing.
Power-Saving Technologies:
- SpeedStep — dynamic frequency adjustment.
- C-States — turning off unused cores.
Tip: To extend battery life, turn off Bluetooth and reduce brightness to 40%.
Comparison with Competitors: What to Choose Instead of the Celeron 857?
1. AMD Athlon Silver 3050e (2020, 2 cores/2 threads, 6W TDP):
- Geekbench 6 Single-Core: 298 (+124%).
- Laptop prices: starting at $350.
2. Apple M1 (in used MacBook Air 2020):
- Geekbench 6 Single-Core: 2340.
- Used price: starting at $500.
3. Intel N100 (2023, 4 cores, 6W TDP):
- Geekbench 6 Multi-Core: 1800.
- Laptops from $300.
Conclusion: The Celeron 837 falls short even against budget modern counterparts. Its only advantage is the price of devices (new laptops starting from $250).
Pros and Cons
Strengths:
- Low cost of devices.
- Passive cooling (complete silence).
- Compatibility with Windows 10/11 (albeit limited).
Weaknesses:
- Does not support modern standards like Wi-Fi 6 and USB-C.
- Maximum RAM capacity of 16GB (DDR3-1333 MHz).
- No hardware decoding for AV1.
Recommendations for Choosing a Laptop
If you decide to buy a device with the Celeron 857:
1. Type of Laptop: ultra-budget (Acer Aspire 1, HP 14) or Chromebook (though Chrome OS may speed up performance).
2. Essential Parameters:
- SSD of 256GB (HDD will slow down the system).
- 8GB RAM (4GB is insufficient even for Windows 11).
- Screen resolution of 1920×1080 (many budget models still use 1366×768).
3. What to Check Before Purchase:
- Run a browser with 10 tabs open.
- Connect an external monitor via HDMI (integrated graphics can sometimes cause artifacts).
Alternatives for $300–400:
- Lenovo IdeaPad 1 with AMD 7320U.
- ASUS Vivobook Go 14 with Intel N100.
Final Verdict: Is It Worth Buying in 2025?
The Celeron 857 is a choice for those who:
- Are looking for the cheapest new laptop (up to $250).
- Do not plan to run "heavy" applications.
- Are willing to tolerate slow performance in multitasking.
Key Benefits:
- Price lower than mid-range smartphones.
- Reliability (Sandy Bridge architecture has stood the test of time).
- Compatibility with legacy software (for example, older versions of Windows).
Summary: This processor is a "workhorse" for the simplest tasks. If your budget allows for spending an additional $100–150, opt for modern CPUs (Intel N-series, AMD Zen 2). However, for basic office work, the Celeron 857 can still serve its purpose.