AMD E-450

AMD E-450

AMD E-450: Review of an Outdated Processor for Basic Tasks in 2025

(Relevant as of April 2025)


Introduction

The AMD E-450 processor, released in 2011, became part of the era of budget mobile solutions. Despite becoming outdated by 2025, it can still be found in used or refurbished laptops. In this article, we'll explore who could find such a chip useful today, how it performs with tasks, and how it differs from modern counterparts.


1. Architecture and Manufacturing Process

Cores and Threads:

The AMD E-450 is built on the Bobcat microarchitecture, which is focused on low power consumption. The processor features 2 cores and 2 threads, operating at a base frequency of 1.65 GHz. There is no turbo mode—it's a static frequency, which limits performance in resource-intensive scenarios.

Integrated Graphics:

The chip includes a Radeon HD 6320 GPU with 80 stream processors operating at 508 MHz. It supports DirectX 11, which allowed for running simple games back in the day, but today, it is insufficient even for browser-based projects.

Manufacturing Process:

The 40nm process technology is the main drawback in terms of energy efficiency. Modern processors (such as Intel's Alder Lake-U or AMD's Ryzen 3 7320U) utilize 5-7nm, providing higher performance with lower TDP.


2. Power Consumption and TDP

The TDP of the E-450 is 18W, which is considered high for ultra-budget systems in 2025. In comparison, the Intel N100 (with a TDP of 6W) shows 5-7 times greater performance at a similar TDP.

Heat Dissipation:

Due to the 40nm manufacturing process, the chip runs hotter than modern counterparts, but passive cooling manages the load effectively. In older laptops, overheating issues may arise due to the degradation of thermal paste and fans.


3. Performance in Real Tasks

Office Work:

- Geekbench 6: Single-Core - 112, Multi-Core - 189.

- In practice: Opening 5-10 tabs in a browser (Chrome or Firefox) will cause noticeable stutters. Working with documents (Word, Excel) is possible, but running heavy PDFs or scripts in a browser will be problematic.

Multimedia:

- Playing 1080p videos (YouTube, local files) is possible, but may exhibit stutters at 60 FPS.

- Streaming services (Netflix, Twitch) require hardware decoding, which the E-450 GPU partially supports, but with a significant load on the system.

Gaming:

- CS:GO: 15-20 FPS on low settings at 720p resolution.

- Minecraft: 20-25 FPS (versions up to 1.12).

- Modern games (even indie projects like Hades) will not run due to GPU power limitations.


4. Use Cases in 2025

Who would benefit from the E-450:

- Children/Students: For studying (text editors, Zoom) and simple games (Roblox on minimal settings).

- Older Users: Managing emails, photo viewing, basic surfing.

- Enthusiasts: Installing lightweight OS (Linux Lite, Puppy Linux) for experimentation.

Not suitable for:

- Video/audio editing.

- Modern games and applications with AI components.

- Multitasking (running several heavy programs simultaneously).


5. Battery Life and Energy Saving

Operating Time:

In 2011-2013, laptops with the E-450 were equipped with 40-50 Wh batteries, providing 4-5 hours of operation. In 2025, due to battery degradation, actual operating time has decreased to 1.5-2.5 hours.

Energy-Saving Technologies:

- Cool’n’Quiet: Dynamic frequency reduction under low load.

- PowerNow!: Voltage management to reduce power consumption.

Tip: Replacing HDDs with SSDs (e.g., Kingston A400 240 GB - $25) and increasing RAM to 8 GB will extend device lifespan.


6. Comparison with Competitors

2011-2013 Analogues:

- Intel Atom N2800: Worse in multithreading but better in energy efficiency.

- Intel Celeron 847: Comparable performance but at a higher price at the time.

Modern Competitors (2025):

- Intel N100: TDP 6W, 4 cores, 4 threads, Geekbench 6 Single-Core - 1200. Laptop prices start from $250.

- AMD Athlon Silver 7120U: 2 cores, 2 threads, 15W TDP, Geekbench 6 Single-Core - 850. Price starts from $300.

Conclusion: The E-450 is hopelessly outdated even compared to budget newcomers.


7. Pros and Cons

Strengths:

- Low cost of used devices ($50-100).

- Support for DirectX 11 (for its time).

- Compatibility with Windows 7/8.1 and lightweight Linux distributions.

Weaknesses:

- Insufficient performance for modern OS (Windows 10/11).

- High power consumption relative to power.

- Lack of support for modern standards (USB 3.0, Wi-Fi 6).


8. Recommendations for Laptop Selection

Types of Devices:

- Budget Laptops: In 2025, the E-450 is only found in the used segment.

- Ultrabooks: Avoid this option—modern models based on Intel Core i3-1215U or AMD Ryzen 3 7320U offer a better price-performance ratio (starting from $400).

What to Pay Attention To:

- SSD is a must: An HDD will slow the system to an unacceptable level.

- RAM: Minimum of 4 GB, ideally 8 GB.

- Display: IPS panel with a resolution of 1366x768 is the standard for such devices.


9. Final Conclusion

The AMD E-450 in 2025 is a choice for those who need an extremely cheap PC for basic tasks. Its advantages include:

- Extremely low price on the secondary market.

- Adequacy for working with text and browsing (with optimization).

Who it is suitable for:

- Students on a tight budget.

- Users in need of a "backup" laptop.

Alternative: New devices based on Intel N100 or AMD Athlon Silver 7120U ($250-$350) offer 5-10 times greater performance with similar battery life.


Conclusion:

The AMD E-450 is a relic of the past that may still serve in extreme cases. However, investing more than $100 in it is impractical—modern budget chips outperform it in every aspect.

Basic

Label Name
AMD
Platform
Mobile
Launch Date
August 2011
Model Name
?
The Intel processor number is just one of several factors - along with processor brand, system configurations, and system-level benchmarks - to be considered when choosing the right processor for your computing needs.
E-450
Code Name
Zacate
Generation
E (Zacate)

CPU Specifications

Total Cores
?
Cores is a hardware term that describes the number of independent central processing units in a single computing component (die or chip).
2
Total Threads
?
Where applicable, Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology is only available on Performance-cores.
2
Basic Frequency
1650 MHz
Max Turbo Frequency
?
Max Turbo Frequency is the maximum single-core frequency at which the processor is capable of operating using Intel® Turbo Boost Technology and, if present, Intel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 and Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost. Frequency is typically measured in gigahertz (GHz), or billion cycles per second.
N/A
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
Multiplier
16.5x
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
CPU Socket
?
The socket is the component that provides the mechanical and electrical connections between the processor and motherboard.
AMD Socket FT1
Multiplier Unlocked
No
Technology
?
Lithography refers to the semiconductor technology used to manufacture an integrated circuit, and is reported in nanometer (nm), indicative of the size of features built on the semiconductor.
40 nm
TDP
18 W

Memory Specifications

Memory Type
?
Intel® processors come in four different types: Single Channel, Dual Channel, Triple Channel, and Flex Mode. Maximum supported memory speed may be lower when populating multiple DIMMs per channel on products that support multiple memory channels.
DDR3
Memory Channels
?
The number of memory channels refers to the bandwidth operation for real world application.
Single-channel
ECC Memory
No

GPU Specifications

Integrated Graphics Model
?
An integrated GPU refers to the graphics core that is integrated into the CPU processor. Leveraging the processor's powerful computational capabilities and intelligent power efficiency management, it delivers outstanding graphics performance and a smooth application experience at a lower power consumption.
Radeon HD 6320

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
112
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
189
Geekbench 5
Single Core Score
143
Geekbench 5
Multi Core Score
272
Passmark CPU
Single Core Score
497
Passmark CPU
Multi Core Score
433

Compared to Other CPU

Geekbench 6 Single Core
357 +218.8%
313 +179.5%
257 +129.5%
180 +60.7%
112
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
693 +266.7%
601 +218%
500 +164.6%
336 +77.8%
189
Geekbench 5 Single Core
335 +134.3%
298 +108.4%
243 +69.9%
177 +23.8%
143
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
688 +152.9%
588 +116.2%
471 +73.2%
332 +22.1%
272
Passmark CPU Single Core
822 +65.4%
703 +41.4%
588 +18.3%
497
95 -80.9%
Passmark CPU Multi Core
1102 +154.5%
888 +105.1%
668 +54.3%
463 +6.9%
433