Intel Core i5-480M

Intel Core i5-480M

Intel Core i5-480M: An Outdated Warrior or a Budget Option for Basic Tasks in 2025?

Analyzing the capabilities of Intel's first-generation Core processor in today's realities


Introduction

By 2025, technology has advanced significantly: processors with neuromorphic cores, chips on a 3nm process, and AI accelerators have become the norm. However, even in the era dominated by Intel Core Ultra and AMD Ryzen 8000, devices with "retro hardware," such as those based on the Intel Core i5-480M, still exist. This dual-core processor from 2010 is still found in used laptops and refurbished models. But is it worth considering today? Let's break it down.


Architecture and Process Technology

Arrandale: The First Step Toward Integration

The Core i5-480M belongs to the first generation of Intel Core processors (codenamed Arrandale), released in 2010. This was a breakthrough as it was the first time the CPU and GPU (Intel HD Graphics) were integrated on a single die, although the graphics still depended on the chipset (HM55/QM57 series).

- Cores and Threads: 2 cores, 4 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading.

- Clock Frequencies: Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, Turbo Boost up to 2.93 GHz.

- Cache: A modest 3 MB L3 cache (for comparison, modern Core i5s have 12-18 MB).

- GPU: Intel HD Graphics (based on the chipset) with a frequency of 500-766 MHz. Supports DirectX 10 but lacks hardware decoding for 4K video.

The Westmere architecture, based on a 32nm process, looks archaic by 2025 standards. Modern processors use 5–3nm processes, resulting in 5–7 times higher transistor density.


Power Consumption and TDP

35 Watts: A Compromise Between Power and Battery Life

A TDP of 35W was acceptable for thin work laptops in 2010. However, today similar performance can be achieved with a TDP of 10–15W (e.g., Intel Core i3-N305).

- Heat Generation: Without an effective cooling system, laptops quickly overheat under load.

- Energy Efficiency: Lacks modern technologies like Intel Thread Director or adaptive frequency management.


Performance in Real Tasks

Geekbench 6: 368 (Single-Core), 643 (Multi-Core)

These results are comparable to budget ARM processors of 2025 (e.g., Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 3) but fall short of modern x86 chips:

- Office Work: Google Docs, Excel, and a browser with 5-7 tabs are acceptable, but delays occur when launching large PDFs or online presentations.

- Multimedia: Viewing 1080p video is possible, but 4K is unsupported. Editing in DaVinci Resolve is excluded.

- Gaming: Only older games at low settings (e.g., Half-Life 2 at 30 fps). Fortnite or CS2 is a slideshow even at minimum settings.

- Turbo Boost: Boosting to 2.93 GHz yields a 10–15% increase in single-threaded tasks, but due to overheating, the Turbo mode rarely lasts longer than 1–2 minutes.


Use Cases

Who is the i5-480M still relevant for in 2025?

1. Ultra-Budget Devices: Laptops priced under $200–250 (e.g., refurbished Lenovo ThinkPad X201).

2. Office Tasks: Text editing, email, Zoom (without background filters).

3. Educational Projects: Devices for schools in developing countries.

Categorically Unsuitable For:

- Modern gaming, video editing, programming using Docker/virtualization.


Battery Life

2-3 Hours of Usage: The Price of Age

Even with a new battery, laptops with the i5-480M rarely last more than 3 hours of active use. Reasons include:

- High TDP and lack of energy-efficient cores.

- Outdated technologies: Intel SpeedStep reduces frequency at idle but cannot compare to modern solutions like AMD Zen 4c.


Comparison with Competitors

2010 vs 2025: Evolution is Obvious

- AMD at the Time: Athlon II P340 (2 cores, 2.2 GHz) – worse in multi-threading but cheaper.

- Modern Analogues:

- Intel Processor N100 (2023): 6W TDP, 4 cores, 3500 points in Geekbench 6 Multi-Core.

- AMD Ryzen 3 7320U: 15W, 4 cores/8 threads, built-in RDNA 2 graphics.

Conclusion: The i5-480M lags behind even budget newcomers in 2025 by 3-5 times in performance and 2-3 times in energy efficiency.


Pros and Cons

Strengths:

- Support for Hyper-Threading for basic multitasking.

- Compatibility with Windows 10/11 (with limitations) and Linux.

- Low cost of devices on the secondary market.

Weaknesses:

- No support for USB 3.0, NVMe, Wi-Fi 6.

- Maximum of 16 GB DDR3-1066 (considered slow by modern standards).

- High power consumption.


Laptop Purchase Recommendations

If considering the i5-480M in 2025:

1. Purpose of Purchase: Only as a temporary solution for simple tasks.

2. Essential Requirements:

- SSD instead of HDD (SATA II limited to 300 MB/s).

- 8 GB RAM (for Windows 10).

- Battery diagnostics (originals are already worn out).

Alternatives under $400:

- New: Lenovo IdeaPad 1 with AMD 3020e ($329) — 2 cores, but 6W TDP and 8 hours of battery life.

- Refurbished: Dell Latitude 3190 (2022) with Intel Pentium Silver N5030 — supports modern standards.


Final Conclusion

In 2025, the Intel Core i5-480M is an option for those on an extremely tight budget or for specific tasks (like a terminal for old software). Its key advantages are price and compatibility with legacy systems. However, for most users, even budget newcomers in 2025 offer dramatically better performance, battery life, and support for modern technologies. Buying a laptop with such a processor is only advisable if there are no real alternatives.

Basic

Label Name
Intel
Platform
Mobile
Launch Date
January 2011
Model Name
?
The Intel processor number is just one of several factors - along with processor brand, system configurations, and system-level benchmarks - to be considered when choosing the right processor for your computing needs.
Core i5-480M
Code Name
Arrandale
Generation
Core i5 (Arrandale)

CPU Specifications

Total Cores
?
Cores is a hardware term that describes the number of independent central processing units in a single computing component (die or chip).
2
Total Threads
?
Where applicable, Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology is only available on Performance-cores.
4
Basic Frequency
2.667 GHz
Max Turbo Frequency
?
Max Turbo Frequency is the maximum single-core frequency at which the processor is capable of operating using Intel® Turbo Boost Technology and, if present, Intel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 and Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost. Frequency is typically measured in gigahertz (GHz), or billion cycles per second.
up to 2.933 GHz
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
3 MB (shared)
Bus Frequency
133 MHz
Multiplier
20.0x
CPU Socket
?
The socket is the component that provides the mechanical and electrical connections between the processor and motherboard.
Intel Socket G1
Multiplier Unlocked
No
Technology
?
Lithography refers to the semiconductor technology used to manufacture an integrated circuit, and is reported in nanometer (nm), indicative of the size of features built on the semiconductor.
32 nm
TDP
35 W
PCI Express Version
?
PCI Express Revision is the supported version of the PCI Express standard. Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (or PCIe) is a high-speed serial computer expansion bus standard for attaching hardware devices to a computer. The different PCI Express versions support different data rates.
Gen 2
Transistors
382 million

Memory Specifications

Memory Type
?
Intel® processors come in four different types: Single Channel, Dual Channel, Triple Channel, and Flex Mode. Maximum supported memory speed may be lower when populating multiple DIMMs per channel on products that support multiple memory channels.
DDR3
ECC Memory
No

GPU Specifications

Integrated Graphics Model
?
An integrated GPU refers to the graphics core that is integrated into the CPU processor. Leveraging the processor's powerful computational capabilities and intelligent power efficiency management, it delivers outstanding graphics performance and a smooth application experience at a lower power consumption.
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
368
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
643
Geekbench 5
Single Core Score
421
Geekbench 5
Multi Core Score
855
Passmark CPU
Single Core Score
1167
Passmark CPU
Multi Core Score
1323

Compared to Other CPU

Geekbench 6 Single Core
432 +17.4%
403 +9.5%
324 -12%
273 -25.8%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
888 +38.1%
741 +15.2%
532 -17.3%
412 -35.9%
Geekbench 5 Single Core
464 +10.2%
444 +5.5%
393 -6.7%
362 -14%
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
1036 +21.2%
934 +9.2%
787 -8%
688 -19.5%
Passmark CPU Single Core
1276 +9.3%
1220 +4.5%
1109 -5%
1068 -8.5%
Passmark CPU Multi Core
1616 +22.1%
1451 +9.7%
1223 -7.6%
1058 -20%