Unisoc Tiger T616
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Unisoc Tiger T616
and
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (12 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3000 MHz (2000 MHz vs 3000 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: December 2021 (January 2021 vs December 2021)
Basic
Unisoc
Label Name
Qualcomm
January 2021
Launch Date
December 2021
SmartPhone Low end
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Tiger T616
Model Name
SM8450
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
12 nm
Technology
4 nm
2000 MHz
Frequency
3000 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G57 MP1
GPU name
Adreno 730
750 MHz
GPU frequency
818 MHz
0.096 TFLOPS
FLOPS
2.5128 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
768
1
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.1
2160 x 1080
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
11
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 7
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
No
5G support
Yes
5.0
Bluetooth
5.3
5
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5
1866 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
1 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
Storage type
UFS 3.1
1K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
-
TDP
5.3 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
No
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Tiger T616
453
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1664
+267%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Tiger T616
1509
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
4030
+167%
FP32 (float)
Tiger T616
98
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2462
+2412%
AnTuTu 10
Tiger T616
279366
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1096529
+293%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Motorola Moto G14
Unisoc Tiger T616
54
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
790
3DMark Wild Life
Teclast M50 Pro
Unisoc Tiger T616
477
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
9565
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Oukitel OKT3
Unisoc Tiger T616
26671
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
33310
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Blackview Tab 16 Pro
Unisoc Tiger T616
8107
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
13969
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/unisoc-tiger-t616-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-8-gen-1" target="_blank">Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1</a>