Samsung Exynos 2600
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2600
and
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 2 nm (2 nm vs 4 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2026 (January 2026 vs March 2024)
- Higher Frequency: 3000 MHz (3.8 GHz vs 3000 MHz)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Qualcomm
January 2026
Launch Date
March 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung Foundry (2 nm GAA)
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E9965
Model Name
SM8650-AB
1× C1-Ultra up to 3.8 GHz; 3× C1-Pro up to 3.25 GHz; 6× C1-Pro up to 2.75 GHz
Architecture
1x 3.0 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A520
10
Cores
8
2 nm
Technology
4 nm
3.8 GHz
Frequency
3000 MHz
GPU Specifications
Xclipse 960
GPU name
Adreno 735
-
GPU frequency
750 MHz
-
FLOPS
3.7308 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
786
-
Execution units
2
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.3
Up to 4K@120 Hz
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
-
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 5000 Mbps
-
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
-
5G support
Yes
-
Bluetooth
5.4
-
Wi-Fi
7
-
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
-
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
-
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L3 cache
8 MB
-
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Up to 320 MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 4.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
Up to 8K@30 fps encode; up to 4K@120 fps recording; HDR
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265 (HEVC), VP9, AV1; APV (Advanced Professional Video)
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
Up to 8K@60 fps decode; HDR10+ playback
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
-
TDP
6 W
Armv9.3-A (AArch64), SME2
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
NPU/AI engine: 32K MAC; up to +113% gen-AI performance vs Exynos 2500
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2600
3150
+92%
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
1638
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2600
11100
+178%
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
3991
AntuTu 11
Exynos 2600
3161126
+76%
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
1797821
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
12698
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
5198
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
1376
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
516
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
9015
Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
5241
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
3108
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
1089
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
875
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
1063
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20523
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
11201
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
5171
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
3116
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
7519
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
12439
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
133077
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
54772
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20423
OnePlus Nord 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
18902
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2600-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-8s-gen-3" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3</a>