Samsung Exynos 2500
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2500
and
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: January 2025 (January 2025 vs November 2024)
- Higher Frequency: 3400 MHz (3200 MHz vs 3400 MHz)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
January 2025
Launch Date
November 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Exynos 2500
Model Name
Dimensity 9400
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A730
3x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A730
10
Cores
8
3 nm
Technology
3 nm
3200 MHz
Frequency
3400 MHz
GPU Specifications
-
GPU frequency
1300 MHz
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.4
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5T
Memory type
LPDDR5T
4800 MHz
Memory frequency
4800 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
-
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.0
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2500
2719
Dimensity 9400
2832
+4%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2500
9016
Dimensity 9400
11974
+33%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2500
2570180
Dimensity 9400
3518353
+37%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
9365
Oppo Find X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
11475
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
1160
Vivo Pad5 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
829
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
1200
Vivo X200 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
762
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
10736
Oppo Find X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
11764
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2233
Oppo Find X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
2452
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2342
Oppo Find X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
2442
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
37192
Vivo X200 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
164746
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
16072
Oppo Find X8
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
16605
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2500-vs-mediatek-dimensity-9400" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400</a>