Samsung Exynos 2500
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2500
and
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 3 nm (3 nm vs 4 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2025 (January 2025 vs May 2024)
- Higher Frequency: 3400 MHz (3200 MHz vs 3400 MHz)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
January 2025
Launch Date
May 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Exynos 2500
Model Name
Dimensity 9300 Plus
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
10
Cores
8
3 nm
Technology
4 nm
3200 MHz
Frequency
3400 MHz
-
Transistor count
22.7
GPU Specifications
-
GPU name
Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
-
GPU frequency
1300 MHz
-
FLOPS
5.9904 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
192
-
Execution units
12
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 7900 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.4
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5T
Memory type
LPDDR5T
4800 MHz
Memory frequency
4800 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
1 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
-
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.0
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 790
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2500
2719
+21%
Dimensity 9300 Plus
2256
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2500
9016
+22%
Dimensity 9300 Plus
7396
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2500
2570180
+14%
Dimensity 9300 Plus
2259162
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
19059
Realme Neo7
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
18852
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
25095
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
16533
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
9365
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
8050
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
1160
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
663
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
1200
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
581
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
10736
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
8271
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2233
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
1898
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2342
Realme Neo7
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
1875
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
37192
UleFone Armor 28 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
58023
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
16072
UleFone Armor 28 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
19083
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2500-vs-mediatek-dimensity-9300-plus" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus</a>