Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2400
and
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 3 nm (4 nm vs 3 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 4210 (3210 MHz vs 4210)
- Newer Launch Date: September 2025 (January 2024 vs September 2025)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
January 2024
Launch Date
September 2025
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Exynos 2400
Model Name
-
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra, 3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium, 4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
10
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
3 nm
3210 MHz
Frequency
4210
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU name
GPU Arm Mali-G1 Ultra MC12
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
1750 MHz
-
Shading units
128
-
Max display resolution
WQHD+ 180Hz
Connectivity
Up to 10000 Mbps
Download speed
-
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
Yes
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
6.0
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
5333 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
2MB/1MB/512KB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
320 MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
-
8K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.3
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek NPU 990
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2400
2080
Dimensity 9500
4007
+93%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2400
6582
Dimensity 9500
11217
+70%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2400
1698761
Dimensity 9500
4011932
+136%
AntuTu 11
Exynos 2400
2046435
Dimensity 9500
3760662
+84%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
22918
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8318
OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
15142
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
864
OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
1381
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
895
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
912
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8724
Vivo X300s
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
15176
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
Oppo Find X9
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
3423
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1865
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
3072
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
Vivo iQOO 15T
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
19933
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
7450
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
14934
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
21035
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
94857
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
16431
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2400-vs-mediatek-dimensity-9500" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500</a>