Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
Unisoc Tiger T616
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1680
and
Unisoc Tiger T616
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 12 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2900 MHz vs 2000 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (March 2026 vs January 2021)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Unisoc
March 2026
Launch Date
January 2021
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Low end
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E8865
Model Name
Tiger T616
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
12 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
2000 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 550
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
750 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.096 TFLOPS
128
Shading units
64
-
Execution units
1
3.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.4
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
12.1
DirectX version
11
Connectivity
Up to 5100 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
Yes
5G support
No
6.1
Bluetooth
5.0
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
-
Memory frequency
1866 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
No
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1680
1361
+200%
Tiger T616
453
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1680
4359
+189%
Tiger T616
1509
FP32 (float)
Exynos 1680
1203
+1128%
Tiger T616
98
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1680
1408598
+404%
Tiger T616
279366
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1680-vs-unisoc-tiger-t616" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1680 vs Unisoc Tiger T616</a>