Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1680
and
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (March 2026 vs November 2023)
- Higher Frequency: 3350 MHz (2900 MHz vs 3350 MHz)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
March 2026
Launch Date
November 2023
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E8865
Model Name
Dimensity 8300
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
3350 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 550
GPU name
Mali-G615 MC5 / MC6
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
1400 MHz
128
Shading units
-
-
Execution units
5 / 6
3.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.4
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
WQHD+ @ 120 Hz, FHD+ @ 180 Hz
12.1
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 5100 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 5170 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
Yes
6.1
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
6E
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
-
Memory frequency
4266 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 780
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1680
1361
Dimensity 8300
1506
+11%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1680
4359
Dimensity 8300
4844
+11%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1680
1408598
Dimensity 8300
1518170
+8%
AntuTu 11
Exynos 1680
1390055
Dimensity 8300
1604305
+15%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
768
Asus Pad (T3201)
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
1248
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
783
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
899
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
5980
Unihertz 8849 Tank 4 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
9696
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1695
Unihertz 8849 Tank 4 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
2956
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1680-vs-mediatek-dimensity-8300" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1680 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300</a>