Samsung Exynos 1380
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1380
and
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 5 nm (5 nm vs 6 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: February 2023 (February 2023 vs January 2021)
- Higher Frequency: 2600 MHz (2400 MHz vs 2600 MHz)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
February 2023
Launch Date
January 2021
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E8835
Model Name
MT6891Z/CZA
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
6 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
2600 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G68 MP5
GPU name
Mali-G77 MP9
950 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
0.608 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.9792 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
64
5
Execution units
9
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 3790 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 4700 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 19
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
320 KB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 32MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
10 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 3.0
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1380
1008
Dimensity 1100
1107
+10%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1380
2773
Dimensity 1100
3332
+20%
FP32 (float)
Exynos 1380
620
Dimensity 1100
999
+61%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1380
578941
Dimensity 1100
770936
+33%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
5860
Realme Q3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
7788
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1380
5001
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
6926
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1380
6329
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
8184
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
295
Vivo S9
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
444
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
2966
Vivo S9
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
4462
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A54
Samsung Exynos 1380
808
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
1238
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A54
Samsung Exynos 1380
2844
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
4310
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy M54
Samsung Exynos 1380
17460
Realme Q3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
32374
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1380)
Samsung Exynos 1380
13227
Realme Q3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
13368
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A54
Samsung Exynos 1380
797
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
1221
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1380-vs-mediatek-dimensity-1100" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100</a>