Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
vs
Samsung Exynos 2600
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
and
Samsung Exynos 2600
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3200 MHz (3200 MHz vs 3.8 GHz)
- Higher Technology: 2 nm (4 nm vs 2 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2026 (April 2025 vs January 2026)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
Samsung
April 2025
Launch Date
January 2026
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung Foundry (2 nm GAA)
SM8735
Model Name
S5E9965
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.02 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.02 GHz – Cortex-A720
Architecture
1× C1-Ultra up to 3.8 GHz; 3× C1-Pro up to 3.25 GHz; 6× C1-Pro up to 2.75 GHz
8
Cores
10
4 nm
Technology
2 nm
3200 MHz
Frequency
3.8 GHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 825
GPU name
Xclipse 960
1150 MHz
GPU frequency
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
Up to 4K@120 Hz
Connectivity
Up to 4200 Mbps
Download speed
-
Yes
5G support
-
6.0
Bluetooth
-
7
Wi-Fi
-
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
-
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4800 MHz
Memory frequency
-
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
-
Miscellaneous
2.75 MB
L2 Cache
-
8 MB
L3 cache
-
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
-
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
Up to 320 MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.1
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video capture
Up to 8K@30 fps encode; up to 4K@120 fps recording; HDR
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265 (HEVC), VP9, AV1; APV (Advanced Professional Video)
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback
Up to 8K@60 fps decode; HDR10+ playback
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
Armv9.3-A (AArch64), SME2
Hexagon
Neural processor (NPU)
NPU/AI engine: 32K MAC; up to +113% gen-AI performance vs Exynos 2500
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
2116
Exynos 2600
3150
+49%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
7082
Exynos 2600
11100
+57%
AntuTu 11
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
2314417
Exynos 2600
3161126
+37%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Solar Bay
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
8191
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
12698
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
803
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
1376
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
8042
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
9015
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
1820
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
3108
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
1804
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
875
3DMark Wild Life
OnePlus Turbo 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
16055
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20523
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Turbo 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
4350
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
5171
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
OnePlus Nord 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
17278
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
7519
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Meizu 22
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
217741
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
133077
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
17084
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20423
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-8s-gen-4-vs-samsung-exynos-2600" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Samsung Exynos 2600</a>