Samsung Exynos 2600
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9500

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Samsung Exynos 2600 and MediaTek Dimensity 9500 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 2 nm (2 nm vs 3 nm)
  • Newer Launch Date: January 2026 (January 2026 vs September 2025)
  • Higher Frequency: 4210 (3.8 GHz vs 4210)

Basic

Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
January 2026
Launch Date
September 2025
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung Foundry (2 nm GAA)
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E9965
Model Name
-
1× C1-Ultra up to 3.8 GHz; 3× C1-Pro up to 3.25 GHz; 6× C1-Pro up to 2.75 GHz
Architecture
1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra, 3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium, 4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
10
Cores
8
2 nm
Technology
3 nm
3.8 GHz
Frequency
4210

GPU Specifications

Xclipse 960
GPU name
GPU Arm Mali-G1 Ultra MC12
-
GPU frequency
1750 MHz
-
Shading units
128
Up to 4K@120 Hz
Max display resolution
WQHD+ 180Hz

Connectivity

-
4G support
Yes
-
5G support
Yes
-
Bluetooth
6.0
-
Wi-Fi
7
-
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
-
Memory frequency
5333 MHz
-
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

NPU/AI engine: 32K MAC; up to +113% gen-AI performance vs Exynos 2500
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek NPU 990
-
L2 Cache
2MB/1MB/512KB
-
Audio codecs
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
Up to 320 MP
Max camera resolution
320 MP
UFS 4.1
Storage type
-
Up to 8K@30 fps encode; up to 4K@120 fps recording; HDR
Video capture
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265 (HEVC), VP9, AV1; APV (Advanced Professional Video)
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Up to 8K@60 fps decode; HDR10+ playback
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Armv9.3-A (AArch64), SME2
Instruction set
ARMv9.3

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2600
3150
Dimensity 9500
4007 +27%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2600
11100
Dimensity 9500
11217 +1%