Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 2910 MHz (2840 MHz vs 2910 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: March 2023 (December 2020 vs March 2023)

Basic

Qualcomm
Label Name
Qualcomm
December 2020
Launch Date
March 2023
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
-
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM8350
Model Name
SM7475-AB
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.49 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
2840 MHz
Frequency
2910 MHz
-
Transistor count
10.2

GPU Specifications

Adreno 660
GPU name
Adreno 725
840 MHz
GPU frequency
580 MHz
1.72 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.7817 TFLOPS
512
Shading units
768
2
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3360 x 1600
12
DirectX version
12.1

Connectivity

Up to 2500 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 4400 Mbps
LTE Cat. 22
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
-
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

1 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
8K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
10 W
TDP
6 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Hexagon 780
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 888
1481
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
1699 +15%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 888
3794
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
4419 +16%
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 888
1754
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
1817 +4%
AiTuTu 3
Snapdragon 888
503622
Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
620704 +23%

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
9612
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
10355
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
11106
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
12023
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
529
Realme GT Neo5 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
619
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
293
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
605
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
7656
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
1548
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
1962
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
7669
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
1523
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
1930