Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
vs
MediaTek MT6750

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 and MediaTek MT6750 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 5 nm (5 nm vs 28 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 2840 MHz (2840 MHz vs 1500 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: December 2020 (December 2020 vs August 2016)

Basic

Qualcomm
Label Name
MediaTek
December 2020
Launch Date
August 2016
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
-
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM8350
Model Name
MT6750
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1 GHz – Cortex-A53
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
28 nm
2840 MHz
Frequency
1500 MHz
-
Transistor count
1

GPU Specifications

Adreno 660
GPU name
Mali-T860 MP2
840 MHz
GPU frequency
520 MHz
1.72 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.0333 TFLOPS
512
Shading units
16
2
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
1.2
1.1
Vulkan version
1.0
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
1280 x 720
12
DirectX version
11

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 22
4G support
LTE Cat. 6
-
5G support
No
5.2
Bluetooth
4.1
6
Wi-Fi
4
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR3
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
667 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
1x 32 Bit

Miscellaneous

Hexagon 780
Neural processor (NPU)
No
1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Max camera resolution
1x 16MP
UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
1K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
8K at 30FPS
Video playback
1080p at 30FPS
10 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8-A

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 888
1481 +973%
MT6750
138
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 888
3794 +844%
MT6750
402
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 888
1754 +5381%
MT6750
32