Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
vs
Samsung Exynos 990
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
and
Samsung Exynos 990
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 7 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3200 MHz (3200 MHz vs 2730 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: November 2022 (November 2022 vs October 2019)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
Samsung
November 2022
Launch Date
October 2019
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
SM8550-AB
Model Name
S5E9830
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X3
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
7 nm
3200 MHz
Frequency
2730 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 740
GPU name
Mali-G77 MP11
680 MHz
GPU frequency
800 MHz
3.4816 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.126 TFLOPS
1280
Shading units
64
2
Execution units
11
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2400
12.1
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 10000 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.1
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
2750 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
1 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 25MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS
6.3 W
TDP
9 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Hexagon
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1993
+137%
Exynos 990
842
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
5328
+99%
Exynos 990
2672
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3411
+197%
Exynos 990
1149
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1550709
+115%
Exynos 990
721171
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
16040
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
7365
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
18518
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
8723
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1152
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
494
3DMark Wild Life
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
13757
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
4436
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3860
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
1421
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8S Pro / 8S Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
14583
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
4500
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
54872
Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
19460
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Meizu 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
19449
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
12071
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3713
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos 990)
Samsung Exynos 990
1409
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-8-gen-2-vs-samsung-exynos-990" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 990</a>