Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
vs
Unisoc T606
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
and
Unisoc T606
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 6 nm (6 nm vs 12 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2400 MHz (2400 MHz vs 1600 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: September 2021 (May 2021 vs September 2021)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
Unisoc
May 2021
Launch Date
September 2021
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Low end
-
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM7325
Model Name
T606
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
12 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
1600 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 642L
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
490 MHz
GPU frequency
650 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.0832 TFLOPS
384
Shading units
64
2
Execution units
1
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
12
DirectX version
11
Connectivity
Up to 1200 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
-
5G support
No
5.2
Bluetooth
5.0
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
1600 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 192MP, 2x 36MP
Max camera resolution
1x 24MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0, UFS 2.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.1-A
Hexagon 770
Neural processor (NPU)
No
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 778G
981
+164%
T606
372
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 778G
2787
+99%
T606
1397
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 778G
597891
+129%
T606
261381
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6439
ZTE Nubia V70 Design
Unisoc T606
1479
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5063
ZTE Nubia V70 Design
Unisoc T606
982
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
4588
Blackview Tab 60 Pro
Unisoc T606
984
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5459
Motorola Moto E13
Unisoc T606
1667
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6663
Motorola Moto E13
Unisoc T606
1503
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Oppo Reno7 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
234
Blackview Tab 60 Pro
Unisoc T606
51
3DMark Wild Life
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
2490
UleFone Note 16 Pro
Unisoc T606
425
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
28872
Doogee Blade 10 Ultra
Unisoc T606
23224
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
13272
Doogee Blade 10 Ultra
Unisoc T606
8505
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-778g-vs-unisoc-t606" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Unisoc T606</a>