Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 4 nm (6 nm vs 4 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 3200 MHz (2400 MHz vs 3200 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: November 2022 (May 2021 vs November 2022)

Basic

Qualcomm
Label Name
Qualcomm
May 2021
Launch Date
November 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
-
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM7325
Model Name
SM8550-AB
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X3
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
4 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
3200 MHz

GPU Specifications

Adreno 642L
GPU name
Adreno 740
490 MHz
GPU frequency
680 MHz
-
FLOPS
3.4816 TFLOPS
384
Shading units
1280
2
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.1
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
12.1

Connectivity

Up to 1200 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
-
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

2 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 192MP, 2x 36MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
5 W
TDP
6.3 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Hexagon 770
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 778G
981
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1993 +103%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 778G
2787
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
5328 +91%
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 778G
597891
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1550709 +159%
AiTuTu 3
Snapdragon 778G
361114
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1143842 +217%

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5459
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
16040
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6663
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro / 8 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
18518
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Oppo Reno7 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
234
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1152
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
226
Meizu 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1185
3DMark Wild Life
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
2490
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
13757
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
693
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3860
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
2493
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8S Pro / 8S Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
14583
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
28872
ZTE Nubia Z50S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
54872
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
13272
Meizu 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
19449
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
688
Asus ROG Phone 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3713