Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
vs
Samsung Exynos 1580

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus and Samsung Exynos 1580 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 4 nm (6 nm vs 4 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2500 MHz vs 2900 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: October 2024 (October 2021 vs October 2024)

Basic

Qualcomm
Label Name
Samsung
October 2021
Launch Date
October 2024
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
SM7325-AE
Model Name
S5E8855
1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
4 nm
2500 MHz
Frequency
2900 MHz

GPU Specifications

Adreno 642
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 540
550 MHz
GPU frequency
-
0.8448 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
384
Shading units
-
2
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
12.1
DirectX version
12.1

Connectivity

Up to 3700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 5100 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

2 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 192MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Hexagon 770
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 778G Plus
1069
Exynos 1580
1333 +25%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 778G Plus
3008
Exynos 1580
3971 +32%
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 778G Plus
604344
Exynos 1580
824714 +36%

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5656
Samsung Galaxy A56
Samsung Exynos 1580
8438
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
7383
Samsung Galaxy A56
Samsung Exynos 1580
10389
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
250
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580
657
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
244
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580
681
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2799
Samsung Galaxy A56
Samsung Exynos 1580
4866
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Xiaomi Civi 1S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
22519
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580
62144
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
12441
Samsung Galaxy A56
Samsung Exynos 1580
14056