Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 and Unisoc Tiger T612 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 6 nm (6 nm vs 12 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2400 MHz (2400 MHz vs 1800 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: May 2022 (October 2021 vs May 2022)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
Unisoc
October 2021
Launch Date
May 2022
SmartPhone Low end
Platform
SmartPhone Low end
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM6225
Model Name
Tiger T612
4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Architecture
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
12 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
1800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 610
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
1110 MHz
GPU frequency
614 MHz
0.284 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.0786 TFLOPS
128
Shading units
64
1
Execution units
1
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
12.1
DirectX version
11
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 13
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
No
5G support
No
5.1
Bluetooth
5.0
5
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
1866 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 32 Bit
17 Gbit/s
Max Bandwidth
-
Miscellaneous
Hexagon 686
Neural processor (NPU)
-
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
1K at 60FPS
Video capture
1K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
1080p at 30FPS
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 680
414
Tiger T612
426
+3%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 680
1447
Tiger T612
1522
+5%
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 680
316260
+31%
Tiger T612
242301
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 680
290
+282%
Tiger T612
76
