Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T616
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G and Unisoc Tiger T616 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 8 nm (8 nm vs 12 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2021 (January 2021 vs January 2021)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
Unisoc
January 2021
Launch Date
January 2021
SmartPhone Low end
Platform
SmartPhone Low end
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM4350
Model Name
Tiger T616
2x 2 GHz – Kryo 460 Gold6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 460 Silver
Architecture
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
8 nm
Technology
12 nm
2000 MHz
Frequency
2000 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 619
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
825 MHz
GPU frequency
750 MHz
0.4224 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.096 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
64
-
Execution units
1
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.3
-
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
-
DirectX version
11
Connectivity
-
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
-
5G support
No
-
Bluetooth
5.0
-
Wi-Fi
5
-
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
-
Memory type
LPDDR4X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
1866 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
17 Gbit/s
Max Bandwidth
-
Miscellaneous
-
Neural processor (NPU)
No
-
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
-
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
-
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
-
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
-
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
3 W
TDP
-
-
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 480 5G
699
+54%
Tiger T616
453
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 480 5G
1817
+20%
Tiger T616
1509
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 480 5G
360090
+29%
Tiger T616
279366
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 480 5G
430
+339%
Tiger T616
98
