MediaTek Helio G200
vs
Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Helio G200
and
Samsung Exynos 1680
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (6 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2200 MHz vs 2900 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (May 2025 vs March 2026)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
May 2025
Launch Date
March 2026
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Helio G200
Model Name
S5E8865
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76, 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
4 nm
2200 MHz
Frequency
2900 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G57 MP2
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 550
1100 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
0.1408 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
32
Shading units
128
2.0
OpenCL version
3.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.4
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
12
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
Up to 650 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 5100 Mbps
LTE Cat. 13
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
No
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
6.1
5
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
-
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
UFS 2.2
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Helio G200
755
Exynos 1680
1361
+80%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Helio G200
2038
Exynos 1680
4359
+114%
FP32 (float)
Helio G200
137
Exynos 1680
1203
+778%
AnTuTu 10
Helio G200
435929
Exynos 1680
1408598
+223%
AntuTu 11
Helio G200
603568
Exynos 1680
1390055
+130%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
147
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
768
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
MediaTek Helio G200
1397
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
5980
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
MediaTek Helio G200
403
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1695
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
MediaTek Helio G200
1408
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
6205
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-helio-g200-vs-samsung-exynos-1680" target="_blank">MediaTek Helio G200 vs Samsung Exynos 1680</a>