MediaTek Dimensity 9300
vs
Unisoc Tiger T612
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
and
Unisoc Tiger T612
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 12 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3250 MHz (3250 MHz vs 1800 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: November 2023 (November 2023 vs May 2022)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Unisoc
November 2023
Launch Date
May 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Low end
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
Dimensity 9300
Model Name
Tiger T612
1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
Architecture
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
12 nm
3250 MHz
Frequency
1800 MHz
22.7
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
1300 MHz
GPU frequency
614 MHz
5.9904 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.0786 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
64
-
Execution units
1
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
-
DirectX version
11
Connectivity
Up to 10000 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
Yes
5G support
No
5.4
Bluetooth
5.0
7
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5T
Memory type
LPDDR4X
9600 MHz
Memory frequency
1866 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 32 Bit
Miscellaneous
3.5
L2 Cache
-
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video capture
1K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback
1080p at 30FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
-
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 9300
2225
+422%
Tiger T612
426
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 9300
7857
+416%
Tiger T612
1522
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 9300
6110
+7939%
Tiger T612
76
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 9300
2032141
+739%
Tiger T612
242301
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
19049
Realme Narzo N63
Unisoc Tiger T612
991
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
1884
Blackview Mega 8
Unisoc Tiger T612
66
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
16337
Realme C53
Unisoc Tiger T612
424
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
45132
Realme Narzo N63
Unisoc Tiger T612
12395
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
14205
Blackview Mega 8
Unisoc Tiger T612
9836
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-9300-vs-unisoc-tiger-t612" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Unisoc Tiger T612</a>