MediaTek Dimensity 8400
vs
MediaTek Helio G200

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of MediaTek Dimensity 8400 and MediaTek Helio G200 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 6 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 3250 MHz (3250 MHz vs 2200 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: May 2025 (December 2024 vs May 2025)

Basic

MediaTek
Label Name
MediaTek
December 2024
Launch Date
May 2025
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
Dimensity 8400
Model Name
Helio G200
1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3.0 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725
Architecture
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76, 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
6 nm
3250 MHz
Frequency
2200 MHz

GPU Specifications

Mali-G720 MC7
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP2
1400 MHz
GPU frequency
1100 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.1408 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
32
6
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
-
DirectX version
12

Connectivity

-
4G support
LTE Cat. 13
Yes
5G support
No
5.4
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
8533 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

MediaTek NPU 880
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
6 MB
L3 cache
-
3.5 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 2.2
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8400
1684 +123%
Helio G200
755
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8400
6970 +242%
Helio G200
2038
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8400
1772345 +307%
Helio G200
435929