MediaTek Dimensity 8350
vs
Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
and
Samsung Exynos 1680
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3350 MHz (3350 MHz vs 2900 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (November 2024 vs March 2026)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
November 2024
Launch Date
March 2026
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
MT6897 MT6897Z_A/ZA MT8792Z/NA
Model Name
S5E8865
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715, 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715, 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3350 MHz
Frequency
2900 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G615 MP6
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 550
1400 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
2.1504 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
128
Shading units
128
2.0
OpenCL version
3.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.4
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
-
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
Up to 5170 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 5100 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
6.1
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4266 MHz
Memory frequency
-
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
4 MB
L3 cache
-
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
MediaTek APU 780
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8350
1298
Exynos 1680
1361
+5%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8350
4368
+0%
Exynos 1680
4359
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 8350
2172
+81%
Exynos 1680
1203
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8350
1417030
+1%
Exynos 1680
1408598
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-8350-vs-samsung-exynos-1680" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Samsung Exynos 1680</a>