MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs. Helio G200: AnTuTu, Geekbench, and 3DMark Tests

The MediaTek Dimensity 8350 is significantly faster than the Helio G200: in AnTuTu 11, it scores around 1.72 million points versus 604,000. The difference is also substantial in Geekbench 6-1,398 versus 724 points in the single-core test and 4,313 versus 1,927 in the multi-core test. The Dimensity 8350 additionally offers LPDDR5X, UFS 4.0, and 5G support.

Main Differences

The Dimensity 8350 has four performance Cortex-A715 cores, one of which operates at up to 3.35 GHz. The Helio G200 has two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at up to 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores.

The difference in GPU performance is even greater. The Mali-G615 MP6 is significantly faster than the dual-core Mali-G57 MP2. This is especially noticeable in demanding games and graphics tests.

AnTuTu 11 and Geekbench 6

In AnTuTu 11, the Dimensity 8350 scores 1,724,757 points versus 603,568 for the Helio G200-approximately 2.9 times more.

In Geekbench 6, the Dimensity 8350 scores 1,398 points in the single-core test and 4,313 in the multi-core test. The Helio G200 scores 724 and 1,927 points, respectively.

The prices are based on store offers as of September 2026 and depend on the region, memory capacity, and seller.

The Oppo Reno13 5G scores 1.73 million points in AnTuTu 11, while the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ and Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ remain at around 613,000-617,000. The smartphone results confirm the advantage of the Dimensity 8350 seen in the average results for the two SoCs.

In the Geekbench 6 multi-core test, the Reno13 5G scores 4,311 points versus 1,946 for the Spark 40 Pro+. The Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ scores 2,008 points, but this result is still more than twice as low as the Reno13 5G’s score.

Graphics Performance

In 3DMark Steel Nomad Light, the Dimensity 8350 scores around 1,205 points versus 147 for the Helio G200-a difference of more than eight times.

The Oppo Reno13 5G scores 1,184 points, while the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ scores 146. This level of GPU performance limits the Helio G200 in modern demanding games.

The faster GPU in the Dimensity 8350 allows for higher graphics settings and frame rates. The Helio G200 is designed for less demanding games and reduced graphics settings.

The Dimensity 8350 also supports faster LPDDR5X and UFS 4.0. The Helio G200 is limited to LPDDR4X and UFS 2.2, so it also falls behind in both memory bandwidth and storage capabilities.

Connectivity and Multimedia

The Dimensity 8350 supports 5G and Wi-Fi 6E, while the Helio G200 is limited to 4G LTE and Wi-Fi 5.

On the multimedia side, the Dimensity 8350 supports cameras of up to 320 MP and 4K recording, while the Helio G200 supports up to 200 MP and 2K recording.

Conclusion

Based on the test results, the Dimensity 8350 belongs to a significantly higher performance class, especially in terms of GPU performance.

The Helio G200 is designed for affordable smartphones, everyday applications, and undemanding games. Its main limitations compared with the Dimensity 8350 are a significantly slower GPU and the lack of 5G.

The Dimensity 8350 belongs to a higher segment and features more powerful CPU and GPU components, LPDDR5X, UFS 4.0, and 5G. It is noticeably preferable for gaming and resource-intensive tasks, while the Helio G200 is aimed at more affordable 4G smartphones.