MediaTek Dimensity 7025
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 6300

vs
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 mobile chipset comparison

SoC Comparison Result

MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Dimensity 6300: Why 7025 is Significantly Faster

The Dimensity 7025 is noticeably faster than the Dimensity 6300 primarily due to its Cortex-A78 cores instead of the Cortex-A76. The clock speeds differ by only 100 MHz, so the main reason for the performance difference is the more modern cores. Additionally, the Dimensity 7025 supports LPDDR5 and UFS 3.1, whereas the Dimensity 6300 is limited to LPDDR4X and UFS 2.2.

Key Differences

Feature Dimensity 7025 Dimensity 6300
Performance Cores 2 × Cortex-A78, 2.5 GHz 2 × Cortex-A76, 2.4 GHz
Efficiency Cores 6 × Cortex-A55, 2.0 GHz 6 × Cortex-A55, 2.0 GHz
Process Technology TSMC 6 nm TSMC 6 nm
GPU IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G57 MC2
RAM LPDDR5 / LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Storage Up to UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
Maximum Camera 200 MP 108 MP
Display Up to 2520 × 1080, 120 Hz Up to 2520 × 1080, 120 Hz
Peak 5G Speed 2.77 Gbps 3.3 Gbps

The Dimensity 7025 is faster in CPU performance and supports more advanced memory and storage standards. The Dimensity 6300 claims a higher peak 5G speed, but in practice, the actual speed depends more on the operator's network, available bands, and signal quality.

CPU Performance

The main difference is the Cortex-A78 versus the Cortex-A76. Both processors have two performance cores and six efficiency cores, but at similar clock speeds, the Cortex-A78 is significantly faster than the Cortex-A76.

In Geekbench 6, smartphones with the Dimensity 7025 score about 25% higher in both single-core and multi-core tests.

The difference is more noticeable on heavy websites, during app installations, and when processing photos.

Benchmarks in Real Smartphones

The results of specific smartphones are more useful than average SoC ratings since they consider firmware, cooling, and memory configuration.

Smartphone Processor AnTuTu Geekbench 6 Single Geekbench 6 Multi
Motorola Moto G64 Dimensity 7025 ~497,000 ~1025 ~2460
Lava Blaze Duo Dimensity 7025 ~501,000 ~1020 ~2440
Realme C65 5G Dimensity 6300 ~434,000 ~790 ~1980
Realme Narzo N65 5G Dimensity 6300 ~421,000 ~785 ~1940

The gap in Geekbench is more noticeable than in AnTuTu. This is expected: AnTuTu considers not just CPU performance, but also GPU, memory, and storage speed.

Graphics and Gaming

The Dimensity 7025 uses the IMG BXM-8-256, while the Dimensity 6300 uses the Mali-G57 MC2. Here, the difference is notably less than in the CPU section.

Device SoC GPU 3DMark Wild Life
Oukitel WP66 Dimensity 7025 IMG BXM-8-256 ~1447
Samsung Galaxy F06 5G Dimensity 6300 Mali-G57 MC2 ~1352

These results were obtained on different smartphones, so the difference cannot be regarded as a precise comparison of GPUs. The graphics advantage of the Dimensity 7025 is significantly smaller than its CPU advantage.

Both chips can handle less demanding games, while in heavier titles, quality settings will have to be lowered. For a gaming smartphone, both processors are somewhat underwhelming.

Memory, Storage, and Camera

The Dimensity 7025 supports LPDDR5 and UFS 3.1, while the Dimensity 6300 is designed for LPDDR4X and UFS 2.2.

However, the support of the standard by the SoC itself does not guarantee that the manufacturer will necessarily implement it. A smartphone with the Dimensity 7025 may use LPDDR4X or a slower storage option, so it is essential to check the specifications of the specific model.

The Dimensity 7025 also supports cameras with resolutions up to 200 MP compared to 108 MP for the Dimensity 6300. However, the maximum resolution of the sensor does not in itself indicate the quality of the photo: the sensor, optics, and image processing are more important.

What This Difference Means When Choosing a Smartphone

The Dimensity 6300 is more commonly found in budget 5G smartphones. Its performance is adequate for messaging apps, browsing, video, and navigation, but the CPU headroom is limited.

The Dimensity 7025 offers a significantly greater level of CPU performance for the same basic tasks.

However, one should not choose a smartphone solely based on the processor: price, display, cameras, and memory capacity may be more crucial. If a model with the Dimensity 6300 is significantly cheaper and the tasks are limited to browsing, video, navigation, and messaging apps, then its performance is sufficient.

Conclusion

The Dimensity 7025 is significantly faster than the Dimensity 6300 in CPU performance. The main reason is the Cortex-A78 instead of the Cortex-A76, rather than an additional 100 MHz in clock speed. It also supports LPDDR5 and UFS 3.1.

The graphics difference is much smaller, so the main advantage of the Dimensity 7025 remains its CPU performance.

If the smartphones are close in price and other specifications, it’s better to choose the model with the Dimensity 7025. The Dimensity 6300 should be considered when a device with it is significantly cheaper.

Advantages

  • Higher Frequency: 2500 MHz (2500 MHz vs 2400 MHz)

Basic

MediaTek
Label Name
MediaTek
April 2024
Launch Date
April 2024
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
Dimensity 7025
Model Name
Dimensity 6300
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
6 nm
2500 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz
10
Transistor count
-

GPU Specifications

IMG BXM-8-256
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP2
950 MHz
GPU frequency
-
18
Shading units
64
8
Execution units
2
3.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080

Connectivity

Up to 2770 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 3300 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.2
5
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.2
2K at 30FPS
Video capture
2K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
2K at 30FPS
Video playback
2K at 30FPS
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 7025
1004 +27%
Dimensity 6300
790
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 7025
2521 +24%
Dimensity 6300
2030
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 7025
485165 +2%
Dimensity 6300
476569