SoC Comparison Result
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Dimensity 6300: Why 7025 is Significantly Faster
The Dimensity 7025 is noticeably faster than the Dimensity 6300 primarily due to its Cortex-A78 cores instead of the Cortex-A76. The clock speeds differ by only 100 MHz, so the main reason for the performance difference is the more modern cores. Additionally, the Dimensity 7025 supports LPDDR5 and UFS 3.1, whereas the Dimensity 6300 is limited to LPDDR4X and UFS 2.2.
Key Differences
| Feature | Dimensity 7025 | Dimensity 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Cores | 2 × Cortex-A78, 2.5 GHz | 2 × Cortex-A76, 2.4 GHz |
| Efficiency Cores | 6 × Cortex-A55, 2.0 GHz | 6 × Cortex-A55, 2.0 GHz |
| Process Technology | TSMC 6 nm | TSMC 6 nm |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| RAM | LPDDR5 / LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage | Up to UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Maximum Camera | 200 MP | 108 MP |
| Display | Up to 2520 × 1080, 120 Hz | Up to 2520 × 1080, 120 Hz |
| Peak 5G Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 3.3 Gbps |
The Dimensity 7025 is faster in CPU performance and supports more advanced memory and storage standards. The Dimensity 6300 claims a higher peak 5G speed, but in practice, the actual speed depends more on the operator's network, available bands, and signal quality.
CPU Performance
The main difference is the Cortex-A78 versus the Cortex-A76. Both processors have two performance cores and six efficiency cores, but at similar clock speeds, the Cortex-A78 is significantly faster than the Cortex-A76.
In Geekbench 6, smartphones with the Dimensity 7025 score about 25% higher in both single-core and multi-core tests.
The difference is more noticeable on heavy websites, during app installations, and when processing photos.
Benchmarks in Real Smartphones
The results of specific smartphones are more useful than average SoC ratings since they consider firmware, cooling, and memory configuration.
| Smartphone | Processor | AnTuTu | Geekbench 6 Single | Geekbench 6 Multi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motorola Moto G64 | Dimensity 7025 | ~497,000 | ~1025 | ~2460 |
| Lava Blaze Duo | Dimensity 7025 | ~501,000 | ~1020 | ~2440 |
| Realme C65 5G | Dimensity 6300 | ~434,000 | ~790 | ~1980 |
| Realme Narzo N65 5G | Dimensity 6300 | ~421,000 | ~785 | ~1940 |
The gap in Geekbench is more noticeable than in AnTuTu. This is expected: AnTuTu considers not just CPU performance, but also GPU, memory, and storage speed.
Graphics and Gaming
The Dimensity 7025 uses the IMG BXM-8-256, while the Dimensity 6300 uses the Mali-G57 MC2. Here, the difference is notably less than in the CPU section.
| Device | SoC | GPU | 3DMark Wild Life |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oukitel WP66 | Dimensity 7025 | IMG BXM-8-256 | ~1447 |
| Samsung Galaxy F06 5G | Dimensity 6300 | Mali-G57 MC2 | ~1352 |
These results were obtained on different smartphones, so the difference cannot be regarded as a precise comparison of GPUs. The graphics advantage of the Dimensity 7025 is significantly smaller than its CPU advantage.
Both chips can handle less demanding games, while in heavier titles, quality settings will have to be lowered. For a gaming smartphone, both processors are somewhat underwhelming.
Memory, Storage, and Camera
The Dimensity 7025 supports LPDDR5 and UFS 3.1, while the Dimensity 6300 is designed for LPDDR4X and UFS 2.2.
However, the support of the standard by the SoC itself does not guarantee that the manufacturer will necessarily implement it. A smartphone with the Dimensity 7025 may use LPDDR4X or a slower storage option, so it is essential to check the specifications of the specific model.
The Dimensity 7025 also supports cameras with resolutions up to 200 MP compared to 108 MP for the Dimensity 6300. However, the maximum resolution of the sensor does not in itself indicate the quality of the photo: the sensor, optics, and image processing are more important.
What This Difference Means When Choosing a Smartphone
The Dimensity 6300 is more commonly found in budget 5G smartphones. Its performance is adequate for messaging apps, browsing, video, and navigation, but the CPU headroom is limited.
The Dimensity 7025 offers a significantly greater level of CPU performance for the same basic tasks.
However, one should not choose a smartphone solely based on the processor: price, display, cameras, and memory capacity may be more crucial. If a model with the Dimensity 6300 is significantly cheaper and the tasks are limited to browsing, video, navigation, and messaging apps, then its performance is sufficient.
Conclusion
The Dimensity 7025 is significantly faster than the Dimensity 6300 in CPU performance. The main reason is the Cortex-A78 instead of the Cortex-A76, rather than an additional 100 MHz in clock speed. It also supports LPDDR5 and UFS 3.1.
The graphics difference is much smaller, so the main advantage of the Dimensity 7025 remains its CPU performance.
If the smartphones are close in price and other specifications, it’s better to choose the model with the Dimensity 7025. The Dimensity 6300 should be considered when a device with it is significantly cheaper.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2500 MHz (2500 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
Basic
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
GPU Specifications
Connectivity
Memory Specifications
Miscellaneous
Benchmarks
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-7025-vs-mediatek-dimensity-6300" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300</a>