HiSilicon Kirin 8000
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
and
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: October 2024 (October 2024 vs May 2021)
- Higher Technology: 6 nm (7 nm vs 6 nm)
Basic
HiSilicon
Label Name
Qualcomm
October 2024
Launch Date
May 2021
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
SMIC
Manufacturing
-
Kirin 8000
Model Name
SM7325
1x 2.4 GHz – 1xA77 H
3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz – A55
3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz – A55
Architecture
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
8
Cores
8
7 nm
Technology
6 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G610 MP4
GPU name
Adreno 642L
864 MHz
GPU frequency
490 MHz
0.4423 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
128
Shading units
384
-
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.1
-
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 1200 Mbps
-
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
-
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 192MP, 2x 36MP
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
-
TDP
5 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 770
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Kirin 8000
1019
+4%
Snapdragon 778G
981
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Kirin 8000
3007
+8%
Snapdragon 778G
2787
AnTuTu 10
Kirin 8000
666377
+11%
Snapdragon 778G
597891
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
6308
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6439
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
5406
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5063
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
316
Oppo Reno7 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
234
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Huawei Nova 13 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
46991
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
28872
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
10251
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
13272
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/hisilicon-kirin-8000-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-778g" target="_blank">HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G</a>