HiSilicon Kirin 8000
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
and
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: October 2024 (October 2024 vs November 2023)
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (7 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3350 MHz (2400 MHz vs 3350 MHz)
Basic
HiSilicon
Label Name
MediaTek
October 2024
Launch Date
November 2023
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
SMIC
Manufacturing
TSMC
Kirin 8000
Model Name
Dimensity 8300 ultra
1x 2.4 GHz – 1xA77 H
3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz – A55
3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz – A55
Architecture
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715, 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715, 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
7 nm
Technology
4 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
3350 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G610 MP4
GPU name
Mali-G615 MP6
864 MHz
GPU frequency
1400 MHz
0.4423 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
128
Shading units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
-
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
Connectivity
-
4G support
Yes
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
4266 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
-
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
-
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 780
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Kirin 8000
1019
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1506
+48%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Kirin 8000
3007
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
4844
+61%
AnTuTu 10
Kirin 8000
666377
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1518170
+128%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
316
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1182
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Huawei Nova 13 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
46991
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
41915
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Huawei Nova 13
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
10251
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
13978
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/hisilicon-kirin-8000-vs-mediatek-dimensity-8300-ultra" target="_blank">HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra</a>