Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
vs
Samsung Exynos 2600
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
and
Samsung Exynos 2600
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2840 MHz (2840 MHz vs 3.8 GHz)
- Higher Technology: 2 nm (5 nm vs 2 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2026 (December 2020 vs January 2026)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
Samsung
December 2020
Launch Date
January 2026
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
-
Manufacturing
Samsung Foundry (2 nm GAA)
SM8350
Model Name
S5E9965
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
1× C1-Ultra up to 3.8 GHz; 3× C1-Pro up to 3.25 GHz; 6× C1-Pro up to 2.75 GHz
8
Cores
10
5 nm
Technology
2 nm
2840 MHz
Frequency
3.8 GHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 660
GPU name
Xclipse 960
840 MHz
GPU frequency
-
1.72 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
512
Shading units
-
2
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.1
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
Up to 4K@120 Hz
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 2500 Mbps
Download speed
-
LTE Cat. 22
4G support
-
5.2
Bluetooth
-
6
Wi-Fi
-
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
-
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
-
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
-
Miscellaneous
1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
-
1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Max camera resolution
Up to 320 MP
UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
Up to 8K@30 fps encode; up to 4K@120 fps recording; HDR
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265 (HEVC), VP9, AV1; APV (Advanced Professional Video)
8K at 30FPS
Video playback
Up to 8K@60 fps decode; HDR10+ playback
10 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
Armv9.3-A (AArch64), SME2
Hexagon 780
Neural processor (NPU)
NPU/AI engine: 32K MAC; up to +113% gen-AI performance vs Exynos 2500
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 888
1481
Exynos 2600
3150
+113%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 888
3794
Exynos 2600
11100
+193%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
529
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
3108
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
293
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
875
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20523
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
1548
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
5171
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
7519
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
38350
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
133077
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
16735
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20423
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-888-vs-samsung-exynos-2600" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 2600</a>