MediaTek Dimensity 8350
vs
Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
and
Samsung Exynos 1680
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3350 MHz (3350 MHz vs 2900 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (November 2024 vs March 2026)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
November 2024
Launch Date
March 2026
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
MT6897 MT6897Z_A/ZA MT8792Z/NA
Model Name
S5E8865
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715, 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715, 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3350 MHz
Frequency
2900 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G615 MP6
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 550
1400 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
2.1504 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
128
Shading units
128
2.0
OpenCL version
3.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.4
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
-
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
Up to 5170 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 5100 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
6.1
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4266 MHz
Memory frequency
-
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
4 MB
L3 cache
-
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
MediaTek APU 780
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8350
1298
Exynos 1680
1361
+5%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8350
4368
+0%
Exynos 1680
4359
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 8350
2172
+81%
Exynos 1680
1203
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8350
1417030
+1%
Exynos 1680
1408598
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Realme P3 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
1319
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
768
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Oppo Reno13 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
1198
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
783
3DMark Wild Life
FCNT Arrows Alpha F-51F
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
10287
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
5980
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Reno13 (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
3079
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1695
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/index.php/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-8350-vs-samsung-exynos-1680" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Samsung Exynos 1680</a>